Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Neoscriber Demo Publisher

Comparison of Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery MRI with T2W-TSE and STIR in the Detection of Cervical Multiple Sclerosis Lesions

Hamed Naghibi 1 , Babak Shekarchi 1 , * , Hamed Bagheri 1 , Amir Reza Azimi 2 and Madjid Shakiba 3
Authors Information
1 AJA Radiation Sciences Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 MS Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 30, 2019, 16 (2); e84059
  • Published Online: April 24, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 8, 2018
  • Revised: February 16, 2019
  • Accepted: April 7, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.84059

To Cite: Naghibi H, Shekarchi B, Bagheri H, Azimi A R, Shakiba M. Comparison of Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery MRI with T2W-TSE and STIR in the Detection of Cervical Multiple Sclerosis Lesions, Iran J Radiol. 2019 ; 16(2):e84059. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.84059.

Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Gass A, Rocca MA, Agosta F, Ciccarelli O, Chard D, Valsasina P, et al. MRI monitoring of pathological changes in the spinal cord in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):443-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70294-7. [PubMed: 25748099].
  • 2. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O, De Stefano N, Evangelou N, Kappos L, et al. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(3):292-303. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00393-2. [PubMed: 26822746]. [PubMed Central: PMC4760851].
  • 3. Poonawalla AH, Hou P, Nelson FA, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. Cervical spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis: T1-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging with phase-sensitive reconstruction. Radiology. 2008;246(1):258-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2463061900. [PubMed: 17991786].
  • 4. Kearney H, Miszkiel KA, Yiannakas MC, Ciccarelli O, Miller DH. A pilot MRI study of white and grey matter involvement by multiple sclerosis spinal cord lesions. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2013;2(2):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2012.09.005. [PubMed: 25877631].
  • 5. Nair G, Absinta M, Reich DS. Optimized T1-MPRAGE sequence for better visualization of spinal cord multiple sclerosis lesions at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(11):2215-22. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3637. [PubMed: 23764721]. [PubMed Central: PMC4278432].
  • 6. Ozturk A, Aygun N, Smith SA, Caffo B, Calabresi PA, Reich DS. Axial 3D gradient-echo imaging for improved multiple sclerosis lesion detection in the cervical spinal cord at 3T. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(4):431-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1118-5. [PubMed: 23208410]. [PubMed Central: PMC3602327].
  • 7. Finkenzeller T, Wendl CM, Lenhart S, Stroszczynski C, Schuierer G, Fellner C. BLADE sequences in transverse T2-weighted MR imaging of the cervical spine. Cut-off for artefacts? Rofo. 2015;36(2):102-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385179. [PubMed: 25912327].
  • 8. Liu W, Nair G, Vuolo L, Bakshi A, Massoud R, Reich DS, et al. In vivo imaging of spinal cord atrophy in neuroinflammatory diseases. Ann Neurol. 2014;76(3):370-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.24213. [PubMed: 25042583]. [PubMed Central: PMC4165784].
  • 9. Nayak NB, Salah R, Huang JC, Hathout GM. A comparison of sagittal short T1 inversion recovery and T2-weighted FSE sequences for detection of multiple sclerosis spinal cord lesions. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;129(3):198-203. doi: 10.1111/ane.12168. [PubMed: 23980614].
  • 10. Sethi V, Yousry TA, Muhlert N, Ron M, Golay X, Wheeler-Kingshott C, et al. Improved detection of cortical MS lesions with phase-sensitive inversion recovery MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(9):877-82. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303023. [PubMed: 22807559].
  • 11. Nelson F, Poonawalla A, Datta S, Wolinsky J, Narayana P. Is 3D MPRAGE better than the combination DIR/PSIR for cortical lesion detection at 3T MRI? Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2014;3(2):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2013.10.002. [PubMed: 25878013].
  • 12. Nelson F, Poonawalla AH, Hou P, Huang F, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. Improved identification of intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with phase-sensitive inversion recovery in combination with fast double inversion recovery MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1645-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0645. [PubMed: 17885241].
  • 13. Hou P, Hasan KM, Sitton CW, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. Phase-sensitive T1 inversion recovery imaging: A time-efficient interleaved technique for improved tissue contrast in neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(6):1432-8. [PubMed: 15956512].
  • 14. Schraa B. T1-weighted phase sensitive inversion recovery for imaging multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord. Clin Neurol. 2013;5:64-8.
  • 15. Kollia K, Maderwald S, Putzki N, Schlamann M, Theysohn JM, Kraff O, et al. First clinical study on ultra-high-field MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of 1.5T and 7T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(4):699-702. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1434. [PubMed: 19147714].
  • 16. Alcaide-Leon P, Pauranik A, Alshafai L, Rawal S, Oh J, Montanera W, et al. Comparison of sagittal FSE T2, STIR, and T1-weighted phase-sensitive inversion recovery in the detection of spinal cord lesions in MS at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(5):970-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4656. [PubMed: 26797141].
  • 17. Fahmy DM, Ashamallah GA. Diagnostic reliability and interobserver agreement in T1-weighted phase sensitive inversion recovery sequence for detection of cervical cord demyelinating plaques. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2018;49(1):176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.12.001.
  • 18. Tornatore C, Phillips JT, Khan O, Miller A, Ally A. Consensus opinion of US neurologists on practice patterns in radiologically and clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting MS. Multiple Sclerosis J. 2014;20:198-9.
  • 19. Preziosa P, Rocca MA, Pagani E, Stromillo ML, Enzinger C, Gallo A, et al. Structural MRI correlates of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37(4):1627-44. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23125. [PubMed: 26833969].
  • 20. Kim G, Khalid F, Oommen VV, Tauhid S, Chu R, Horsfield MA, et al. T1- vs. T2-based MRI measures of spinal cord volume in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:124. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0387-0. [PubMed: 26227960]. [PubMed Central: PMC4521382].
  • 21. Harel A, Ceccarelli A, Farrell C, Fabian M, Howard J, Riley C, et al. Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MRI improves longitudinal cortical lesion detection in progressive MS. PLoS One. 2016;11(3). e0152180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152180. [PubMed: 27002529]. [PubMed Central: PMC4803340].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments