Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 16 (3)

Comparison Between T2, STIR and PSIR Sequences, for Detection of Cervical Cord MS Plaques

Amin Abolhasani Foroughi 1 , 2 , Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam 1 , Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani 1 , * and Masoume Nazeri 3
Authors Information
1 Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Radiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3 Clinical Neurology Research Center, Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: In Press (In Press); e82134
  • Published Online: June 2, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 14, 2018
  • Revised: April 8, 2019
  • Accepted: April 13, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.82134

To Cite: Abolhasani Foroughi A, Saeedi-Moghadam M, Zeinali-Rafsanjani B, Nazeri M. Comparison Between T2, STIR and PSIR Sequences, for Detection of Cervical Cord MS Plaques, Iran J Radiol. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e82134. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.82134.

Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Pietrangelo A, Higuera V. Multiple sclerosis by the numbers: Facts, statistics, and you: Healthline. 2015. Available from:
  • 2. Nikseresht A, Salehi H, Foroughi AA, Nazeri M. Association between urinary symptoms and urinary tract infection in patients with multiple sclerosis. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;8(4):120-6. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n4p253. [PubMed: 26573031]. [PubMed Central: PMC4873596].
  • 3. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(1):121-7. doi: 10.1002/ana.1032. [PubMed: 11456302].
  • 4. Combes AJE, Matthews L, Lee JS, Li DKB, Carruthers R, Traboulsee AL, et al. Cervical cord myelin water imaging shows degenerative changes over one year in multiple sclerosis but not neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;16:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.019. [PubMed: 28725551]. [PubMed Central: PMC5503831].
  • 5. Dekker I, Wattjes MP. Brain and spinal cord MR imaging features in multiple sclerosis and variants. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017;27(2):205-27. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2016.12.002. [PubMed: 28391782].
  • 6. Gebarski SS, Gabrielsen TO, Gilman S, Knake JE, Latack JT, Aisen AM. The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1985;17(5):469-74. doi: 10.1002/ana.410170509. [PubMed: 4004170].
  • 7. Wattjes MP, Lutterbey GG, Harzheim M, Gieseke J, Traber F, Klotz L, et al. Higher sensitivity in the detection of inflammatory brain lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis using high field MRI: An intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T with 3.0 T. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(9):2067-73. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0195-4. [PubMed: 16649033].
  • 8. Chen JJ, Carletti F, Young V, McKean D, Quaghebeur G. MRI differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis. Clin Radiol. 2016;71(9):815-27. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.05.010. [PubMed: 27349475].
  • 9. Paty DW, Oger JJ, Kastrukoff LF, Hashimoto SA, Hooge JP, Eisen AA, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of MS: A prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology. 1988;38(2):180-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.2.180. [PubMed: 3340277].
  • 10. Polman C, Barkhof F, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Linde A, Nordle O, Nederman T, et al. Treatment with laquinimod reduces development of active MRI lesions in relapsing MS. Neurology. 2005;64(6):987-91. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000154520.48391.69. [PubMed: 15781813].
  • 11. Brown JW, Chard DT. The role of MRI in the evaluation of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(2):157-71. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2016.1134323. [PubMed: 26692498].
  • 12. Weerakkody Y, Gaillard F. Multiple sclerosis. 2017. Available from:
  • 13. Abolhasani Foroughi A, Salahi R, Nikseresht A, Heidari H, Nazeri M, Khorsand A. Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and enhanced T1-weighted sequencing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiol J. 2017;30(4):347-51. doi: 10.1177/1971400916678224. [PubMed: 28452571]. [PubMed Central: PMC5524272].
  • 14. Trip SA, Miller DH. Imaging in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76 Suppl 3:iii11-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073213. [PubMed: 16107385]. [PubMed Central: PMC1765701].
  • 15. Chong AL, Chandra RV, Chuah KC, Roberts EL, Stuckey SL. Proton density MRI increases detection of cervical spinal cord multiple sclerosis lesions compared with T2-weighted fast spin-echo. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(1):180-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4476. [PubMed: 26427838].
  • 16. Schmidt C, Hattingen E, Faehndrich J, Jurcoane A, Porto L. Detectability of multiple sclerosis lesions with 3T MRI: A comparison of proton density-weighted and FLAIR sequences. J Neuroradiol. 2012;39(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2011.09.006. [PubMed: 22176757].
  • 17. Hashemi RH, Bradley WG Jr, Chen DY, Jordan JE, Queralt JA, Cheng AE, et al. Suspected multiple sclerosis: MR imaging with a thin-section fast FLAIR pulse sequence. Radiology. 1995;196(2):505-10. doi: 10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617868. [PubMed: 7617868].
  • 18. Hittmair K, Mallek R, Prayer D, Schindler EG, Kollegger H. Spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: Comparison of MR pulse sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(8):1555-65. [PubMed: 8883656].
  • 19. Bot JC, Barkhof F, Lycklama a Nijeholt GJ, Bergers E, Polman CH, Ader HJ, et al. Comparison of a conventional cardiac-triggered dual spin-echo and a fast STIR sequence in detection of spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(5):753-8. doi: 10.1007/s003300050998. [PubMed: 10823627].
  • 20. Vargas MI, Delavelle J, Kohler R, Becker CD, Lovblad K. Brain and spine MRI artifacts at 3Tesla. J Neuroradiol. 2009;36(2):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2008.08.001. [PubMed: 18835643].
  • 21. Hagiwara A, Hori M, Yokoyama K, Takemura MY, Andica C, Tabata T, et al. Synthetic MRI in the detection of multiple sclerosis plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(2):257-63. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5012. [PubMed: 27932506].
  • 22. Schraa B. T1-weighted phase sensitive inversion recovery for imaging multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord. MAGNETOM Flash. 2013;5:64-8.
  • 23. Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I, Bottger T, Nolden M, Schobinger M, et al. The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Med Image Anal. 2005;9(6):594-604. doi: 10.1016/ [PubMed: 15896995].
  • 24. Lycklama a Nijeholt GJ, Barkhof F, Castelijns JA, van Waesberghe JH, Valk J, Jongen PJ, et al. Comparison of two MR sequences for the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in the spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(8):1533-8. [PubMed: 8883653].
  • 25. Nayak NB, Salah R, Huang JC, Hathout GM. A comparison of sagittal short T1 inversion recovery and T2-weighted FSE sequences for detection of multiple sclerosis spinal cord lesions. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;129(3):198-203. doi: 10.1111/ane.12168. [PubMed: 23980614].
  • 26. Alcaide-Leon P, Pauranik A, Alshafai L, Rawal S, Oh J, Montanera W, et al. Comparison of sagittal FSE T2, STIR, and T1-weighted phase-sensitive inversion recovery in the detection of spinal cord lesions in MS at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(5):970-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4656. [PubMed: 26797141].
  • 27. Poonawalla AH, Hou P, Nelson FA, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA. Cervical spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis: T1-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging with phase-sensitive reconstruction. Radiology. 2008;246(1):258-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2463061900. [PubMed: 17991786].
  • 28. Kearney H, Miller DH, Ciccarelli O. Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis--diagnostic, prognostic and clinical value. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(6):327-38. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.80. [PubMed: 26009002].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments