Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and First-Order Histogram Statistics in Differentiating Malignant Versus Benign Meningioma in Adults

Hamidreza Saligheh Rad 1 , 2 , Mojtaba Safari 1 , Anahita Fathi Kazerooni 1 , Yashar Moharamzad 3 and Morteza Sanei Taheri 3 , *
Authors Information
1 Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group (QMISG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 31, 2019, 16 (1); e74324
  • Published Online: November 28, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 5, 2018
  • Revised: August 4, 2018
  • Accepted: November 13, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.74324

To Cite: Saligheh Rad H, Safari M , Fathi Kazerooni A, Moharamzad Y, Sanei Taheri M. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and First-Order Histogram Statistics in Differentiating Malignant Versus Benign Meningioma in Adults, Iran J Radiol. 2019 ; 16(1):e74324. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.74324.

Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Azizyan A, Eboli P, Drazin D, Mirocha J, Maya MM, Bannykh S. Differentiation of benign angiomatous and microcystic meningiomas with extensive peritumoral edema from high grade meningiomas with aid of diffusion weighted MRI. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:650939. doi: 10.1155/2014/650939. [PubMed: 25478572]. [PubMed Central: PMC4248374].
  • 2. Liu Y, Chotai S, Chen M, Jin S, Qi ST, Pan J. Preoperative radiologic classification of convexity meningioma to predict the survival and aggressive meningioma behavior. PLoS One. 2015;10(3). e0118908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118908. [PubMed: 25786236]. [PubMed Central: PMC4364713].
  • 3. Tang Y, Dundamadappa SK, Thangasamy S, Flood T, Moser R, Smith T, et al. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index in grading meningioma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1303-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11637. [PubMed: 24848829].
  • 4. Lin BJ, Chou KN, Kao HW, Lin C, Tsai WC, Feng SW, et al. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging grading and pathological grading in meningioma. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(5):1201-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132359. [PubMed: 25148010].
  • 5. Filippi CG, Edgar MA, Ulug AM, Prowda JC, Heier LA, Zimmerman RD. Appearance of meningiomas on diffusion-weighted images: Correlating diffusion constants with histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(1):65-72. [PubMed: 11158890].
  • 6. Sanverdi SE, Ozgen B, Oguz KK, Mut M, Dolgun A, Soylemezoglu F, et al. Is diffusion-weighted imaging useful in grading and differentiating histopathological subtypes of meningiomas? Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(9):2389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.031. [PubMed: 21723681].
  • 7. Bano S, Waraich MM, Khan MA, Buzdar SA, Manzur S. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient for the accurate assessment and differentiation of intracranial meningiomas. Acta Radiol Short Rep. 2013;2(7):2.0479816135125E+15. doi: 10.1177/2047981613512484. [PubMed: 24349716]. [PubMed Central: PMC3863968].
  • 8. Voultsinou D, Matis GK, Chrysou OI, Birbilis TA, Cheva A, Geroukis T. An atypical meningioma demystified and advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10(2):387-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.136666. [PubMed: 25022401].
  • 9. Nagar VA, Ye JR, Ng WH, Chan YH, Hui F, Lee CK, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Diagnosing atypical or malignant meningiomas and detecting tumor dedifferentiation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(6):1147-52. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0996. [PubMed: 18356472].
  • 10. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051. [PubMed: 15501092].
  • 11. Moharamzad Y, Sanei Taheri M, Niaghi F, Shobeiri E. Brainstem glioma: Prediction of histopathologic grade based on conventional MR imaging. Neuroradiol J. 2018;31(1):10-7. doi: 10.1177/1971400917743099. [PubMed: 29148317]. [PubMed Central: PMC5789999].
  • 12. Server A, Kulle B, Maehlen J, Josefsen R, Schellhorn T, Kumar T, et al. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(6):682-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850902933123. [PubMed: 19449234].
  • 13. Yin B, Liu L, Zhang BY, Li YX, Li Y, Geng DY. Correlating apparent diffusion coefficients with histopathologic findings on meningiomas. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):4050-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.002. [PubMed: 22727725].
  • 14. Chen L, Liu M, Bao J, Xia Y, Zhang J, Zhang L, et al. The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity in patients: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11). e79008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079008. [PubMed: 24244402]. [PubMed Central: PMC3823989].
  • 15. Hakyemez B, Yildirim N, Gokalp G, Erdogan C, Parlak M. The contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to distinguishing typical from atypical meningiomas. Neuroradiology. 2006;48(8):513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0094-z. [PubMed: 16786348].
  • 16. Surov A, Gottschling S, Mawrin C, Prell J, Spielmann RP, Wienke A, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in meningioma: Prediction of tumor grade and association with histopathological parameters. Transl Oncol. 2015;8(6):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.012. [PubMed: 26692534]. [PubMed Central: PMC4700293].
  • 17. Surov A, Ginat DT, Sanverdi E, Lim CC, Hakyemez B, Yogi A, et al. Use of diffusion weighted imaging in differentiating between maligant and benign meningiomas. A multicenter analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:598-602. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.049. [PubMed: 26529294].
  • 18. Santelli L, Ramondo G, Della Puppa A, Ermani M, Scienza R, d'Avella D, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging does not predict histological grading in meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(8):1315-9. discussion 1319. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0657-y. [PubMed: 20428902].
  • 19. Cabada T, Caballero MC, Insausti I, Alvarez de Eulate N, Bacaicoa C, Zazpe I, et al. [The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of meningiomas: Radio-pathologic correlation]. Radiologia. 2009;51(4):411-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2009.01.017. [PubMed: 19552929].
  • 20. Just N. Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(12):2205-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.512. [PubMed: 25268373]. [PubMed Central: PMC4264439].
  • 21. Jung SC, Yeom JA, Kim JH, Ryoo I, Kim SC, Shin H, et al. Glioma: Application of histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to tumor grading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(6):1103-10. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3825. [PubMed: 24384119].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments