Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Neoscriber Demo Publisher

Associated Clinical Parameters of Pain in Patients Undergoing Trans Rectal Ultrasonography of the Prostate

Bo Liang 1 , Feifei Huang 2 and Hao Shen 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Doppler Ultrasonic, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 2017, 14 (4); e63483
  • Published Online: October 31, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 1, 2017
  • Accepted: May 7, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.63483

To Cite: Liang B, Huang F, Shen H. Associated Clinical Parameters of Pain in Patients Undergoing Trans Rectal Ultrasonography of the Prostate, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ;14(4):e63483. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.63483.

Copyright: Copyright © 2017, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Watanabe H, Igari D, Tanahasi Y, Harada K, Saito M. Development and application of new equipment for transrectal ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound. 1974;2(2):91-8. [PubMed: 4136630].
  • 2. Alkan I, Turkeri L, Biren T, Cevik I, Akdas A. Volume determinations by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation with removed prostate weight. Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28(4):517-23. [PubMed: 9119637].
  • 3. Terris MK, Stamey TA. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. J Urol. 1991;145(5):984-7. [PubMed: 2016815].
  • 4. Van PC, Decaestecker K, Hoebeke P. Correlation between prostate volume measured by transrectal and suprapubic ultrasound: can we do without TRUS?. Global congress on Prostate Cancer, Marseille. France. 2013.
  • 5. Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int. 2001;88(6):540-4. [PubMed: 11678747].
  • 6. von Knobloch R, Weber J, Varga Z, Feiber H, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R. Bilateral fine-needle administered local anaesthetic nerve block for pain control during TRUS-guided multi-core prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial. Eur Urol. 2002;41(5):508-14. discussion 514. [PubMed: 12074792].
  • 7. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Dore B, Aubert J. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol. 1997;79(4):608-10. [PubMed: 9126093].
  • 8. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2(7889):1127-31. [PubMed: 4139420].
  • 9. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. [PubMed: 22588748].
  • 10. Philip J, McCabe JE, Roy SD, Samsudin A, Campbell IM, Javle P. Site of local anaesthesia in transrectal ultrasonography-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: does it make a difference?. BJU Int. 2006;97(2):263-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05957.x. [PubMed: 16430625].
  • 11. Rodriguez A, Kyriakou G, Leray E, Lobel B, Guille F. Prospective study comparing two methods of anaesthesia for prostate biopsies: apex periprostatic nerve block versus intrarectal lidocaine gel: review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2003;44(2):195-200. [PubMed: 12875938].
  • 12. Bennett RC, Duthie HL. The functional importance of the internal sphincter. Br J Surg. 1964;51:355-7.
  • 13. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4(2):118-22. [PubMed: 2746132].
  • 14. Frenckner B, Euler CV. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut. 1975;16(6):482-9. [PubMed: 1150119].
  • 15. Gibbons CP, Bannister JJ, Trowbridge EA, Read NW. Role of anal cushions in maintaining continence. The Lancet. 1986;327(8486):886-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90990-6.
  • 16. Jacobs D. Clinical practice. Hemorrhoids. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):944-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1204188. [PubMed: 25184866].
  • 17. Sayfan J, Becker A, Koltun L. Sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy: a new technique. Ann Surg. 2001;234(1):21-4. [PubMed: 11420479].
  • 18. Theerapol A, So BY, Ngoi SS. Routine use of setons for the treatment of anal fistulae. Singapore Med J. 2002;43(6):305-7. [PubMed: 12380728].
  • 19. Czarnecki ML, Turner HN, Collins PM, Doellman D, Wrona S, Reynolds J. Procedural pain management: a position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Manag Nurs. 2011;12(2):95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2011.02.003. [PubMed: 21620311].
  • 20. Tarhan H, Cakmak O, Unal E, Akarken I, Un S, Ekin RG, et al. The effect of video-based education on patient anxiety in men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8(11-12):894-900. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2208. [PubMed: 25553162].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .