Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Clinicians’ Control Preferences Regarding Prevention of Contrast Agent Reactions

Ebru Hasbay 1 , * and Ali Haydar Baykan 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Radilogy, Reyhanli State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
2 Department of Radiology, Adlyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 2017, 14 (4); e63462
  • Published Online: October 31, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 1, 2016
  • Revised: February 24, 2017
  • Accepted: April 29, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.63462

To Cite: Hasbay E, Baykan A H. Clinicians’ Control Preferences Regarding Prevention of Contrast Agent Reactions, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(4):e63462. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.63462.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objective
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 10.2. 2016. Available from: http://www.acr.org/~/media/37D84428BF1D4E1B9A3A2918DA9E27A3.pdf.
  • 2. Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC. Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v. contrast media in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):1533-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2554. [PubMed: 18029897].
  • 3. Callahan MJ, Poznauskis L, Zurakowski D, Taylor GA. Nonionic iodinated intravenous contrast material-related reactions: incidence in large urban children's hospital--retrospective analysis of data in 12,494 patients. Radiology. 2009;250(3):674-81. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503071577. [PubMed: 19244041].
  • 4. ESUR Guidelines on contrast media Version 9.0. 2016. Available from: http://www.esur.org/esur-guidelines/.
  • 5. Council of E. [Developing a methodology for drawing up guidelines on best medical practices. (Recommendation (2001)13 and explanatory memorandum)]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2002;96 Suppl 3:5-59. [PubMed: 12964585].
  • 6. Butler JM, Hirshberg EL, Hopkins RO, Wilson EL, Orme JF, Beesley SJ, et al. Preliminary Identification of Coping Profiles Relevant to Surrogate Decision Making in the ICU. PLoS One. 2016;11(11). e0166542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166542. [PubMed: 27835704].
  • 7. Sepucha KR, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, Levin CA, Matlock DD, Ng CJ, et al. Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2. S12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S12. [PubMed: 24625035].
  • 8. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21-43. [PubMed: 9505581].
  • 9. Kandampully J. Service quality to service loyalty: A relationship which goes beyond customer services. Total Qual Manage. 1998;9(6):431-43. doi: 10.1080/0954412988370.
  • 10. Lewis A. Referral physician marketing. J Health Care Mark. 1993;13(4):20-4. [PubMed: 10131730].
  • 11. Walbridge SW, Delene LM. Measuring physician attitudes of service quality. J Health Care Mark. 1993;13(1):6-15. [PubMed: 10126032].
  • 12. Ponzurick TG, France KR, Logar CM. Referring physician satisfaction: toward a better understanding of hospital referrals. J Hosp Mark. 1998;12(2):95-111. doi: 10.1300/J043v12n02_07. [PubMed: 10186254].
  • 13. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CF, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv. 1-88. [PubMed: 9561895].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments