Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Effect of Sickle Cell Anemia on Pelvic Dimensions: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Nesrin Atci 1 , * , Ilay Gozukara 2 , Fatma Ozturk 3 , Gulen Burakgazi 3 , Raziye Keskin Kurt 4 and Sinem Karazincir 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Özel Antakya Yaşam Cerrahi Tıp Merkezi, Hatay, Turkey
2 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mustafa Kemal University Medical School, Hatay, Turkey
3 Department of Radiology, Mustafa Kemal University Medical School, Hatay, Turkey
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Özel Sevgi Hastanesi, Reyhanlı, Hatay, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 2017, 14 (4); e61845
  • Published Online: October 8, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 13, 2016
  • Revised: April 3, 2017
  • Accepted: July 29, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.61845

To Cite: Atci N, Gozukara I, Ozturk F, Burakgazi G, Keskin Kurt R, et al. Effect of Sickle Cell Anemia on Pelvic Dimensions: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ;14(4):e61845. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.61845.

Abstract
Copyright: Copyright © 2017, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Smith M, Aguirre RT. Reproductive attitudes and behaviors in people with sickle cell disease or sickle cell trait: a qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis. Soc Work Health Care. 2012;51(9):757-79. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2012.693580. [PubMed: 23078010].
  • 2. Koshy M, Chisum D, Burd L, Orlina A, How H. Management of sickle cell anemia and pregnancy. J Clin Apher. 1991;6(4):230-3. [PubMed: 1816245].
  • 3. Villers MS, Jamison MG, De Castro LM, James AH. Morbidity associated with sickle cell disease in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):125 e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.016. [PubMed: 18533123].
  • 4. Ngo C, Kayem G, Habibi A, Benachi A, Goffinet F, Galacteros F, et al. Pregnancy in sickle cell disease: maternal and fetal outcomes in a population receiving prophylactic partial exchange transfusions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;152(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.05.022. [PubMed: 20846778].
  • 5. Yu CK, Stasiowska E, Stephens A, Awogbade M, Davies A. Outcome of pregnancy in sickle cell disease patients attending a combined obstetric and haematology clinic. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(6):512-6. doi: 10.1080/01443610903003175. [PubMed: 19697199].
  • 6. Hamdi IM, Karri KS, Ghani EA. Pregnancy outcome in women with sickle cell trait. Saudi Med J. 2002;23(12):1455-7. [PubMed: 12518190].
  • 7. Lenhard MS, Johnson TR, Weckbach S, Nikolaou K, Friese K, Hasbargen U. Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(3):e107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.042. [PubMed: 19443160].
  • 8. Ferguson J2, Sistrom CL. Can fetal-pelvic disproportion be predicted. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;43(2):247-64. [PubMed: 10863624].
  • 9. Poma PA. X-ray pelvimetry in primiparas. I: Role of physiological maturity. J Natl Med Assoc. 1982;74(2):173-9. [PubMed: 7120453].
  • 10. Fox LK, Huerta-Enochian GS, Hamlin JA, Katz VL. The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1679-85. discussion 1685-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.044. [PubMed: 15284768].
  • 11. Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Parer JT, Hricak H, Callen PW. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144(5):947-50. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.5.947. [PubMed: 3872578].
  • 12. Keller TM, Rake A, Michel SC, Seifert B, Efe G, Treiber K, et al. Obstetric MR pelvimetry: reference values and evaluation of inter- and intraobserver error and intraindividual variability. Radiology. 2003;227(1):37-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2271011658. [PubMed: 12601187].
  • 13. Huerta-Enochian GS, Katz VL, Fox LK, Hamlin JA, Kollath JP. Magnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(6):1689-94. discussion 1694-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.008. [PubMed: 16731086].
  • 14. Gowri V, Jain R, Rizvi S. Magnetic resonance pelvimetry for trial of labour after a previous caesarean section. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2010;10(2):210-4. [PubMed: 21509231].
  • 15. Howard J, Oteng-Ntim E. The obstetric management of sickle cell disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;26(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.10.001. [PubMed: 22113135].
  • 16. Al Jama FE, Gasem T, Burshaid S, Rahman J, Al Suleiman SA, Rahman MS. Pregnancy outcome in patients with homozygous sickle cell disease in a university hospital, Eastern Saudi Arabia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(5):793-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1002-7. [PubMed: 19271230].
  • 17. Smith JA, Espeland M, Bellevue R, Bonds D, Brown AK, Koshy M. Pregnancy in sickle cell disease: experience of the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00367-3. [PubMed: 8559523].
  • 18. Chakravarty EF, Khanna D, Chung L. Pregnancy outcomes in systemic sclerosis, primary pulmonary hypertension, and sickle cell disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4):927-34. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000308710.86880.a6. [PubMed: 18378753].
  • 19. Rajab KE, Issa AA, Mohammed AM, Ajami AA. Sickle cell disease and pregnancy in Bahrain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;93(2):171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.007. [PubMed: 16563397].
  • 20. Serjeant GR, Loy LL, Crowther M, Hambleton IR, Thame M. Outcome of pregnancy in homozygous sickle cell disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(6):1278-85. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127433.23611.54. [PubMed: 15172865].
  • 21. Morrison JJ, Sinnatamby R, Hackett GA, Tudor J. Obstetric pelvimetry in the UK: an appraisal of current practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(9):748-50. [PubMed: 7547769].
  • 22. Wright AR, English PT, Cameron HM, Wilsdon JB. MR pelvimetry--a practical alternative. Acta Radiol. 1992;33(6):582-7. [PubMed: 1449885].
  • 23. Korhonen U, Solja R, Laitinen J, Heinonen S, Taipale P. MR pelvimetry measurements, analysis of inter- and intra-observer variation. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(2):e56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.11.018. [PubMed: 20006454].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader