Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison and Combination of Two Ultrasound Modalities, Handheld Ultrasound and Automated Breast Volume Scanner, With and Without Knowledge of MRI

Yoonsoo Kim 1 , Bong Joo Kang 1 , * , Sung Hun Kim 1 and Eun Jae Lee 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 2018, 15 (2); e60176
  • Published Online: April 25, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 2, 2017
  • Revised: December 6, 2017
  • Accepted: December 13, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.60176

To Cite: Kim Y, Kang B J, Kim S H, Lee E J. Comparison and Combination of Two Ultrasound Modalities, Handheld Ultrasound and Automated Breast Volume Scanner, With and Without Knowledge of MRI, Iran J Radiol. 2018 ; 15(2):e60176. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.60176.

Copyright © 2018, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152. [PubMed: 12393820].
  • 2. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer. 2003;98(4):697-702. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11580. [PubMed: 12910512].
  • 3. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989. [PubMed: 12393819].
  • 4. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233(3):830-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031484. [PubMed: 15486214].
  • 5. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology. 2007;244(2):356-78. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442051620. [PubMed: 17641361].
  • 6. Kuhl CK. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299(18):2203-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2203. [PubMed: 18477789].
  • 7. Debald M, Abramian A, Nemes L, Dobler M, Kaiser C, Keyver-Paik MD, et al. Who may benefit from preoperative breast MRI? A single-center analysis of 1102 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153(3):531-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3556-3. [PubMed: 26323190].
  • 8. Gonzalez V, Sandelin K, Karlsson A, Aberg W, Lofgren L, Iliescu G, et al. Preoperative MRI of the breast (POMB) influences primary treatment in breast cancer: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1685-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2605-0. [PubMed: 24817517].
  • 9. Fortune-Greeley AK, Wheeler SB, Meyer AM, Reeder-Hayes KE, Biddle AK, Muss HB, et al. Preoperative breast MRI and surgical outcomes in elderly women with invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;143(1):203-12. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2787-4. [PubMed: 24305978].
  • 10. Pengel KE, Loo CE, Wesseling J, Pijnappel RM, Rutgers EJ, Gilhuijs KG. Avoiding preoperative breast MRI when conventional imaging is sufficient to stage patients eligible for breast conserving therapy. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(2):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.018. [PubMed: 24220546].
  • 11. Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN, Shimauchi A, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, et al. MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):370-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2707. [PubMed: 20093598].
  • 12. Kuzmiak CM, Ko EY, Tuttle LA, Steed D, Zeng D, Yoon SC. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(7):870-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.006. [PubMed: 25872862].
  • 13. Radiology. ACo . Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. 5th ed. American College of Radiology; 2013.
  • 14. Eberl MM, Fox CH, Edge SB, Carter CA, Mahoney MC. BI-RADS classification for management of abnormal mammograms. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(2):161-4. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.2.161. [PubMed: 16513904].
  • 15. Plana MN, Carreira C, Muriel A, Chiva M, Abraira V, Emparanza JI, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(1):26-38. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2238-8. [PubMed: 21847541].
  • 16. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(4):901-10. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800901. [PubMed: 12646427].
  • 17. Bellon JR, Harris EE, Arthur DW, Bailey L, Carey L, Goyal S, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) conservative surgery and radiation--stage I and II breast carcinoma: expert panel on radiation oncology: breast. Breast J. 2011;17(5):448-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01132.x. [PubMed: 21790842].
  • 18. Theriault RL, Carlson RW, Allred C, Anderson BO, Burstein HJ, Edge SB, et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(7):753-60. quiz 761. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0098. [PubMed: 23847214].
  • 19. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(8):1296-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015. [PubMed: 20304629].
  • 20. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG. Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla State Med Assoc. 2006;99(10):505-15. [PubMed: 17125104].
  • 21. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology. 2003;227(3):856-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2273012210. [PubMed: 12773685].
  • 22. Ferre R, Ianculescu V, Ciolovan L, Mathieu MC, Uzan C, Canale S, et al. Diagnostic Performance of MR-guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: 8 Years of Experience. Breast J. 2016;22(1):83-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12519. [PubMed: 26511082].
  • 23. Sim LS, Hendriks JH, Bult P, Fook-Chong SM. US correlation for MRI-detected breast lesions in women with familial risk of breast cancer. Clin Radiol. 2005;60(7):801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.12.005. [PubMed: 15978891].
  • 24. Beran L, Liang W, Nims T, Paquelet J, Sickle-Santanello B. Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg. 2005;190(4):592-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.019. [PubMed: 16164928].
  • 25. Wiratkapun C, Duke D, Nordmann AS, Lertsithichai P, Narra V, Barton PT, et al. Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(5):618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.016. [PubMed: 18423319].
  • 26. Demartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(4):1128-34. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3987. [PubMed: 19304724].
  • 27. Destounis S, Arieno A, Somerville PA, Seifert PJ, Murphy P, Morgan R, et al. Community-based practice experience of unsuspected breast magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities evaluated with second-look sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(10):1337-46. doi: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.10.1337. [PubMed: 19778880].
  • 28. Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(4):1025-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2480. [PubMed: 19770325].
  • 29. Shin JH, Han BK, Choe YH, Ko K, Choi N. Targeted ultrasound for MR-detected lesions in breast cancer patients. Korean J Radiol. 2007;8(6):475-83. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.6.475. [PubMed: 18071277].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments