Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computerized Tomography Coronary Angiography in Symptomatic Patients Presenting to a Referral Cardiovascular Center During Daily Clinical Practice

Arash Mahdavi 1 , Ali Mohammadzadeh 2 , Golsa Joodi 3 , Mohammad Reza Tabatabaei 3 , Farhad Sheikholeslami 4 and Marzieh Motevalli 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 2016, 13 (2); e59322
  • Published Online: February 29, 2016
  • Article Type: CARDIAC IMAGING
  • Received: October 5, 2014
  • Revised: October 21, 2014
  • Accepted: November 11, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24350

To Cite: Mahdavi A, Mohammadzadeh A, Joodi G, Tabatabaei M R, Sheikholeslami F, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computerized Tomography Coronary Angiography in Symptomatic Patients Presenting to a Referral Cardiovascular Center During Daily Clinical Practice, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(2):e59322. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24350.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013; 127(1)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Azizi F, Salehi P, Etemadi A, Zahedi-Asl S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an urban population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. DIABETES RES CLIN PR. 2003; 61(1): 29-37[DOI]
  • 3. Bax JJ, Schuijf JD. Which role for multislice computed tomography in clinical cardiology? Am Heart J. 2005; 149(6): 960-1[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Yang X, Gai LY, Li P, Chen YD, Li T, Yang L. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT angiography and coronary risk stratification. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010; 6: 935-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(10): 886-95[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(3): 167-77[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(19): 2354-60[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(3): 552-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005; 112(15): 2318-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(12): 2739-47[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(24): 3042-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Shabestari AA, Abdi S, Akhlaghpoor S, Azadi M, Baharjoo H, Pajouh MD, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99(12): 1656-61[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M, Sharif-Kashani B, Nazeri A. Impact of calcification on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice spiral computed tomography for detecting coronary artery disease: a single center experience. Arch Iran Med. 2010; 13(5): 373-83[PubMed]
  • 14. Salavati A, Radmanesh F, Heidari K, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Cronin P. Dual-source computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012; 6(2): 78-90[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, Walker S, Cook JA, Jia X, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12(17)
  • 16. Moon JH, Park EA, Lee W, Yin YH, Chung JW, Park JH, et al. The diagnostic accuracy, image quality and radiation dose of 64-slice dual-source CT in daily practice: a single institution's experience. Korean J Radiol. 2011; 12(3): 308-18[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(2): 256-68[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, van der Lugt A, Nieman K, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ, et al. Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(2): 178-83[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15(4): 827-32[DOI]
  • 20. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975; 51(4 Suppl): 5-40[PubMed]
  • 21. Gouya H, Varenne O, Trinquart L, Touze E, Vignaux O, Spaulding C, et al. Coronary artery stenosis in high-risk patients: 64-section CT and coronary angiography--prospective study and analysis of discordance. Radiology. 2009; 252(2): 377-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004; 329(7458): 168-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17(8): 646-9[PubMed]
  • 24. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Notarangelo F, Ugo F, Palumbo A, Lina D, et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: diagnostic accuracy in the real world. Radiol Med. 2008; 113(2): 163-80[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Li M, Zhang GM, Zhao JS, Jiang ZW, Peng ZH, Jin ZT, et al. Diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with and without heart rate control: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2014; 69(2): 163-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Pannu HK, Flohr TG, Corl FM, Fishman EK. Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. Radiographics. 2003; 23 Spec No-25[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, Nielsen CD, Nguyen SA, Savino G, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007; 244(1): 112-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Diaz-Zamudio M, Bacilio-Perez U, Herrera-Zarza MC, Meave-Gonzalez A, Alexanderson-Rosas E, Zambrana-Balta GF, et al. Coronary artery aneurysms and ectasia: role of coronary CT angiography. Radiographics. 2009; 29(7): 1939-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. LaMotte LC, Mathur VS. Atherosclerotic coronary artery aneurysms: eight-year angiographic follow-up. Tex Heart Inst J. 2000; 27(1): 72-3[PubMed]
  • 30. Arnold R, Ley S, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Eichhorn J, Schenk JP, Ulmer H, et al. Visualization of coronary arteries in patients after childhood Kawasaki syndrome: value of multidetector CT and MR imaging in comparison to conventional coronary catheterization. Pediatr Radiol. 2007; 37(10): 998-1006[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Jacobs JE, Boxt LM, Desjardins B, Fishman EK, Larson PA, Schoepf J, et al. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT). J Am Coll Radiol. 2006; 3(9): 677-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Lazoura O, Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV. Incidental non-cardiac findings of a coronary angiography with a 128-slice multi-detector CT scanner: should we only concentrate on the heart? Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11(1): 60-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 33. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Hamm B. Non-cardiac findings on coronary computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(8): 2038-43[DOI][PubMed]
  • 34. Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G, Aoki J, Nakajima H, Ibukuro K, et al. Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(2): 402-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Halpern EJ. Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Radiology. 2009; 252(2): 332-45[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments