Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computerized Tomography Coronary Angiography in Symptomatic Patients Presenting to a Referral Cardiovascular Center During Daily Clinical Practice

Arash Mahdavi 1 , Ali Mohammadzadeh 2 , Golsa Joodi 3 , Mohammad Reza Tabatabaei 3 , Farhad Sheikholeslami 4 and Marzieh Motevalli 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 2016, 13 (2); e59322
  • Published Online: February 29, 2016
  • Article Type: CARDIAC IMAGING
  • Received: October 5, 2014
  • Revised: October 21, 2014
  • Accepted: November 11, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24350

To Cite: Mahdavi A, Mohammadzadeh A, Joodi G, Tabatabaei M R, Sheikholeslami F, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computerized Tomography Coronary Angiography in Symptomatic Patients Presenting to a Referral Cardiovascular Center During Daily Clinical Practice, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(2):e59322. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24350.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013; 127(1)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Azizi F, Salehi P, Etemadi A, Zahedi-Asl S. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an urban population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. DIABETES RES CLIN PR. 2003; 61(1): 29-37[DOI]
  • 3. Bax JJ, Schuijf JD. Which role for multislice computed tomography in clinical cardiology? Am Heart J. 2005; 149(6): 960-1[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Yang X, Gai LY, Li P, Chen YD, Li T, Yang L. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT angiography and coronary risk stratification. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010; 6: 935-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(10): 886-95[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(3): 167-77[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(19): 2354-60[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(3): 552-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005; 112(15): 2318-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(12): 2739-47[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(24): 3042-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Shabestari AA, Abdi S, Akhlaghpoor S, Azadi M, Baharjoo H, Pajouh MD, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99(12): 1656-61[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M, Sharif-Kashani B, Nazeri A. Impact of calcification on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice spiral computed tomography for detecting coronary artery disease: a single center experience. Arch Iran Med. 2010; 13(5): 373-83[PubMed]
  • 14. Salavati A, Radmanesh F, Heidari K, Dwamena BA, Kelly AM, Cronin P. Dual-source computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012; 6(2): 78-90[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, Walker S, Cook JA, Jia X, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12(17)
  • 16. Moon JH, Park EA, Lee W, Yin YH, Chung JW, Park JH, et al. The diagnostic accuracy, image quality and radiation dose of 64-slice dual-source CT in daily practice: a single institution's experience. Korean J Radiol. 2011; 12(3): 308-18[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(2): 256-68[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, van der Lugt A, Nieman K, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ, et al. Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(2): 178-83[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15(4): 827-32[DOI]
  • 20. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975; 51(4 Suppl): 5-40[PubMed]
  • 21. Gouya H, Varenne O, Trinquart L, Touze E, Vignaux O, Spaulding C, et al. Coronary artery stenosis in high-risk patients: 64-section CT and coronary angiography--prospective study and analysis of discordance. Radiology. 2009; 252(2): 377-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004; 329(7458): 168-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17(8): 646-9[PubMed]
  • 24. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Notarangelo F, Ugo F, Palumbo A, Lina D, et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: diagnostic accuracy in the real world. Radiol Med. 2008; 113(2): 163-80[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Li M, Zhang GM, Zhao JS, Jiang ZW, Peng ZH, Jin ZT, et al. Diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with and without heart rate control: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2014; 69(2): 163-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Pannu HK, Flohr TG, Corl FM, Fishman EK. Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. Radiographics. 2003; 23 Spec No-25[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, Nielsen CD, Nguyen SA, Savino G, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007; 244(1): 112-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Diaz-Zamudio M, Bacilio-Perez U, Herrera-Zarza MC, Meave-Gonzalez A, Alexanderson-Rosas E, Zambrana-Balta GF, et al. Coronary artery aneurysms and ectasia: role of coronary CT angiography. Radiographics. 2009; 29(7): 1939-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. LaMotte LC, Mathur VS. Atherosclerotic coronary artery aneurysms: eight-year angiographic follow-up. Tex Heart Inst J. 2000; 27(1): 72-3[PubMed]
  • 30. Arnold R, Ley S, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Eichhorn J, Schenk JP, Ulmer H, et al. Visualization of coronary arteries in patients after childhood Kawasaki syndrome: value of multidetector CT and MR imaging in comparison to conventional coronary catheterization. Pediatr Radiol. 2007; 37(10): 998-1006[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Jacobs JE, Boxt LM, Desjardins B, Fishman EK, Larson PA, Schoepf J, et al. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT). J Am Coll Radiol. 2006; 3(9): 677-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Lazoura O, Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV. Incidental non-cardiac findings of a coronary angiography with a 128-slice multi-detector CT scanner: should we only concentrate on the heart? Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11(1): 60-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 33. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Hamm B. Non-cardiac findings on coronary computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(8): 2038-43[DOI][PubMed]
  • 34. Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G, Aoki J, Nakajima H, Ibukuro K, et al. Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(2): 402-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Halpern EJ. Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Radiology. 2009; 252(2): 332-45[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments