Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Factors on Patency Periods of Subcutaneous Central Venous Port: Long-Term Results of 1,408 Patients

Bilgin Kadri Aribas 1 , * , Ramazan Tiken 1 , Ozge Aribas 2 , Tugba Uylar 1 , Ismail Akdulum 1 , Ibrahim Turker 3 , Merve Yildiz Aksoy 1 , Turgut Seber 1 , Burcu Sahin 1 , Haci Uzun 1 and Emrah Caglar 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey
2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Ankara, 06100, Tandogan, Ankara, Turkey
3 Department of Medical Oncology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 2017, 14 (2); e36816
  • Published Online: November 12, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 5, 2016
  • Revised: October 6, 2016
  • Accepted: November 1, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.36816

To Cite: Aribas B K, Tiken R, Aribas O, Uylar T, Akdulum I, et al. Factors on Patency Periods of Subcutaneous Central Venous Port: Long-Term Results of 1,408 Patients, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(2):e36816. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.36816.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objective
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
References
  • 1. Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C, Weiss HD. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001; 24(3): 180-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Caers J, Fontaine C, Vinh-Hung V, De Mey J, Ponnet G, Oost C, et al. Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports. Support Care Cancer. 2005; 13(5): 325-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Plumhans C, Mahnken AH, Ocklenburg C, Keil S, Behrendt FF, Gunther RW, et al. Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79(3): 338-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Cil BE, Canyigit M, Peynircioglu B, Hazirolan T, Carkaci S, Cekirge S, et al. Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2006; 12(2): 93-8[PubMed]
  • 5. Lewis CA, Allen TE, Burke DR, Cardella JF, Citron SJ, Cole PE, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14(9 Pt 2)-5[PubMed]
  • 6. Yip D, Funaki B. Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients. Acta Radiol. 2002; 43(4): 371-5[PubMed]
  • 7. Biffi R, Corrado F, de Braud F, de Lucia F, Scarpa D, Testori A, et al. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device. Eur J Cancer. 1997; 33(8): 1190-4[PubMed]
  • 8. Funaki B, Szymski GX, Hackworth CA, Rosenblum JD, Burke R, Chang T, et al. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169(5): 1431-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(12): 1123-33[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003; 327(7411): 361[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Pace U, Bonomo G, Monfardini L, et al. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20(5): 935-40[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Di Carlo I, Pulvirenti E, Mannino M, Toro A. Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17(6): 1649-56[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, Patrianakos AP, Kouraklis G, Poularas J, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Crit Care. 2006; 10(6)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Akahane A, Sone M, Ehara S, Kato K, Tanaka R, Nakasato T. Subclavian vein versus arm vein for totally implantable central venous port for patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective comparative analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011; 34(6): 1222-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Sakamoto N, Arai Y, Takeuchi Y, Takahashi M, Tsurusaki M, Sugimuta K. Ultrasound-Guided Radiological Placement of Central Venous Port via the Subclavian Vein: A Retrospective Analysis of 500 Cases at a Single Institute. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010; 33(5): 989-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Teichgraber UK, Kausche S, Nagel SN, Gebauer B. Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(6): 1224-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Shetty PC, Mody MK, Kastan DJ, Sharma RP, Burke MW, Venugopal C, et al. Outcome of 350 implanted chest ports placed by interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997; 8(6): 991-5[PubMed]
  • 18. Brooks AJ, Alfredson M, Pettigrew B, Morris DL. Ultrasound-guided insertion of subclavian venous access ports. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005; 87(1): 25-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. McNulty NJ, Perrich KD, Silas AM, Linville RM, Forauer AR. Implantable subcutaneous venous access devices: is port fixation necessary? A review of 534 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010; 33(4): 751-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. de Costa BR, Dickey K, Greenwood L. A practical approach for repositioning flipped venous access ports. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000; 11(2 Pt 1): 213-4[PubMed]
  • 21. Ozdemir NY, Abali H, Oksuzoglu B, Budakoglu B, Akmangit I, Zengin N. It appears to be safe to start chemotherapy on the day of implantation through subcutaneous venous port catheters in inpatient setting. Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17(4): 399-403[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Trerotola SO, Kuhn-Fulton J, Johnson MS, Shah H, Ambrosius WT, Kneebone PH. Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access. Radiology. 2000; 217(1): 89-93[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Aribas BK, Arda K, Aribas O, Ciledag N, Yologlu Z, Aktas E, et al. Comparison of subcutaneous central venous port via jugular and subclavian access in 347 patients at a single center. Exp Ther Med. 2012; 4(4): 675-80[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments