Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Variability in Observer Performance Between Faculty Members and Residents Using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, Fifth Edition (2013)

Youn Joo Lee 1 , So Young Choi 2 , Kyu Sun Kim 2 and Po Song Yang 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Radiology, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: July 01, 2016, 13 (3); e28281
  • Published Online: January 9, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 26, 2015
  • Revised: September 7, 2015
  • Accepted: October 14, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.28281

To Cite: Lee Y J, Choi S Y, Kim K S, Yang P S. Variability in Observer Performance Between Faculty Members and Residents Using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, Fifth Edition (2013), Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(3):e28281. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.28281.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol. 2001; 36(3): 217-25[PubMed]
  • 2. Arger PH, Sehgal CM, Conant EF, Zuckerman J, Rowling SE, Patton JA. Interreader variability and predictive value of US descriptions of solid breast masses: pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2001; 8(4): 335-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Heinig J, Witteler R, Schmitz R, Kiesel L, Steinhard J. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 32(4): 573-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, Kwak JY, You JK, Kim MJ, et al. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190(5): 1209-15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. American College of Radiology. . Breast imaging reporting and data system, Breast imaging atlas. 2003;
  • 6. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(4): 1260-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Elverici E, Zengin B, Nurdan Barca A, Didem Yilmaz P, Alimli A, Araz L. Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of Sonographic BIRADS Lexicon in the Assessment of Breast Masses. Iran J Radiol. 2013; 10(3): 122-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology. 2006; 241(2): 355-65[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Walsh R, Mengoni P. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172(6): 1621-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Lee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Lee JY, Kang DR, et al. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 65(2): 293-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Park CS, Lee JH, Yim HW, Kang BJ, Kim HS, Jung JI, et al. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003). Korean J Radiol. 2007; 8(5): 397-402[PubMed]
  • 12. Calas MJ, Almeida RM, Gutfilen B, Pereira WC. Interobserver concordance in the BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound exams. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012; 67(2): 185-9[PubMed]
  • 13. American College of Radiology. . Breast imaging reporting and data system, Breast imaging atlas. 2013;
  • 14. Raza S, Goldkamp AL, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management. Radiographics. 2010; 30(5): 1199-213[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Sedgwick E. The breast ultrasound lexicon: breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Semin Roentgenol. 2011; 46(4): 245-51[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Costantini M, Belli P, Lombardi R, Franceschini G, Mule A, Bonomo L. Characterization of solid breast masses: use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon. J Ultrasound Med. 2006; 25(5): 649-59[PubMed]
  • 17. Carney E, Kempf J, DeCarvalho V, Yudd A, Nosher J. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181(2): 367-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Bechtold RE, Chen MY, Ott DJ, Zagoria RJ, Scharling ES, Wolfman NT, et al. Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997; 21(5): 681-5[PubMed]
  • 19. Erly WK, Berger WG, Krupinski E, Seeger JF, Guisto JA. Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23(1): 103-7[PubMed]
  • 20. Yoon LS, Haims AH, Brink JA, Rabinovici R, Forman HP. Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level I trauma center: abdominal and pelvic CT studies. Radiology. 2002; 224(1): 42-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Albano MC, Ross GW, Ditchek JJ, Duke GL, Teeger S, Sostman HD, et al. Resident interpretation of emergency CT scans in the evaluation of acute appendicitis. Acad Radiol. 2001; 8(9): 915-8[PubMed]
  • 22. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982; 143(1): 29-36[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists. Korean J Radiol. 2004; 5(1): 11-8[PubMed]
  • 24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1): 159-74[PubMed]
  • 25. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005; 37(5): 360-3[PubMed]
  • 26. Filippi CG, Schneider B, Burbank HN, Alsofrom GF, Linnell G, Ratkovits B. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies. Radiology. 2008; 249(3): 972-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Wysoki MG, Nassar CJ, Koenigsberg RA, Novelline RA, Faro SH, Faerber EN. Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. Radiology. 1998; 208(1): 125-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Yavas US, Calisir C, Ozkan IR. The interobserver agreement between residents and experienced radiologists for detecting pulmonary embolism and DVT with using CT pulmonary angiography and indirect CT venography. Korean J Radiol. 2008; 9(6): 498-502[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology. 2009; 252(3): 665-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, Prince JS, Melany ML, Reynolds HE, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology. 1999; 213(3): 889-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995; 196(1): 123-34[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Harper AP, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, Bies JR, Jackson VP. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology. 1983; 146(3): 731-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 33. Heywang SH, Lipsit ER, Glassman LM, Thomas MA. Specificity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 1984; 3(10): 453-61[PubMed]
  • 34. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006; 239(2): 385-91[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments