Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?

Ozlem Marti Akgun 1 , * , Gunseli GuvenPolat 1 , Ahmet TuranIllca 2 , Ceren Yildirim 1 , Pervin Demir 3 and Feridun Basak 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Gulhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey
2 Department of Radiology, Izmir Mevki Military Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
3 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, YildirimBeyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: August 01, 2014, 11 (3); e15565
  • Published Online: August 1, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 22, 2013
  • Revised: January 27, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.15565

To Cite: Marti Akgun O, GuvenPolat G, TuranIllca A, Yildirim C, Demir P, et al. Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?, Iran J Radiol. 2014 ; 11(3):e15565. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.15565.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnote
References
  • 1. Colon P, Pradelle-Plasse N, Galland J. Evaluation of the long-term corrosion behavior of dental amalgams: influence of palladium addition and particle morphology. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(3): 232-9[PubMed]
  • 2. Andrews JT, Hembree JH, Jr. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage of corrosion-resistant amalgam alloy. ASDC J Dent Child. 1975; 42(5): 367-70[PubMed]
  • 3. Derkson GD, Pashley DH, Derkson ME. Microleakage measurement of selected restorative materials: a new in vitro method. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56(4): 435-40[PubMed]
  • 4. Parolia A, Kundabala M, Gupta V, Verma M, Batra C, Shenoy R, et al. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22(2): 252-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Staninec M, Setcos JC. Bonded amalgam restorations: current research and clinical procedure. Dent Update. 2003; 30(8): 430-4[PubMed]
  • 6. Berger A. Magnetic resonance imaging. How does it work? BMJ. 2002; 5(35)
  • 7. Schenck JF. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 12(1): 2-19[PubMed]
  • 8. Shahidi SH, Bronoosh P, Alavi AA, Zamiri B, Sadeghi AR, Bagheri MH, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38(7): 470-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Yilmaz S, Misirlioglu M. The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42(8): 20130072[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Tymofiyeva O, Vaegler S, Rottner K, Boldt J, Hopfgartner AJ, Proff PC, et al. Influence of dental materials on dental MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42(6): 20120271[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Klinke T, Daboul A, Maron J, Gredes T, Puls R, Jaghsi A, et al. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Starcukova J, Starcuk Z, Jr, Hubalkova H, Linetskiy I. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(6): 715-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, Fiebach J, Dickhaus H, Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA. 2005; 18(2): 103-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Muller-Miny H, Erber D, Moller H, Muller-Miny B, Bongartz G. Is there a hazard to health by mercury exposure from amalgam due to MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996; 6(1): 258-60[PubMed]
  • 15. Mortazavi SM, Daiee E, Yazdi A, Khiabani K, Kavousi A, Vazirinejad R, et al. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008; 11(8): 1142-6[PubMed]
  • 16. Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976; 4(5): 199-206[PubMed]
  • 17. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int. 1986; 17(2): 103-11[PubMed]
  • 18. Krejci I, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J Dent. 1991; 19(1): 24-32[PubMed]
  • 19. Tig IA, Fodor O, Moldovan M. Observation of Classical and Bonded Amalgam Restorations 2005;
  • 20. Ziskind D, Venezia E, Kreisman I, Mass E. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90(3): 255-60[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Wilson N. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (4)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Murad M. No available evidence to assess the effectiveness of bonded amalgams. Evid Based Dent. 2009; 10(4): 106[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Jakovljevic A, Pesic D, Popovic M, Melih I. [Influence of different bonding agents on marginal sealing quality of amalgam restorations]. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2011; 139(11-12): 722-7[PubMed]
  • 24. Sharafeddin F, Moradian H. Microleakage of Class II Combined Amalgam-Composite Restorations Using Different Composites and Bonding Agents. J Dent Teh Univ Med Sci. 2008; 5: 126-30
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments