Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Kavous Firouznia 1 , Hossein Ghanaati 1 , Aliakbar Sharafi 2 , Firouze Abahashemi 1 , Hassan Hashemi 1 , Amir Hossein Jalali 1 , * and Madjid Shakiba 1
Authors Information
1 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Medical Physics Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: September 01, 2013, 10 (3); 111-115
  • Published Online: August 30, 2013
  • Article Type: Research ArticleVASCULAR & INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
  • Received: June 29, 2013
  • Revised: June 30, 2013
  • Accepted: July 1, 2013
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13264

To Cite: Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Sharafi A, Abahashemi F, Hashemi H, et al. Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial, Iran J Radiol. 2013 ; 10(3):111-115. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13264.

Abstract
Copyright © 2013, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Spies JB\r\nScialli, et al. Initial Results from Uterine Fibroid Embolization for Symptomatic Leiomyomata. J Vasc Inter Radiol. 1999; 10(9): 1149-1157[DOI]
  • 2. Pelage JP\nLe Dref, et al. Fibroid-related menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up. Radiology. 2000; 215(2): 428-31[PubMed]
  • 3. Firouznia K\nGhanaati. Uterine artery embolization in 101 cases of uterine fibroids: do size, location, and number of fibroids affect therapeutic success and complications? Cardiovasc Inter Radiol. 2008; 31(3): 521-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Fallahi A\nPooyan, et al. Uterine segmentation and volume measurement in uterine fibroid patients' MRI using fuzzy C-mean algorithm and morphological operations. Iran J Radiol. 2011; 8(3): 150-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Spahn M\nStrotzer, et al. Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. Invest Radiol. 2000; 35(4): 260-6[PubMed]
  • 6. Neitzel U\r\nBoehm. Comparison of low-contrast detail detectability with five different conventional and digital radiographic imaging systems. Med Image. 2000; : 216-223[DOI]
  • 7. Geijer H\nBeckman. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11(9): 1704-9[PubMed]
  • 8. Suzuki S\nFurui, et al. Radiation dose to patients and radiologists during transcatheter arterial embolization: comparison of a digital flat-panel system and conventional unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185(4): 855-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Tsapaki V\nKottou, et al. Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol. 2004; 77(919): 562-7[PubMed]
  • 10. Kitai T\nOgawa. [Patient absorbed dose in coronary angiography determined by the flat panel digital detector X-ray system]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2003; 59(3): 423-6[PubMed]
  • 11. Spies JB\r\nPelage. Uterine Artery Embolization and Gynecologic Embolotherapy. 2005;
  • 12. Spies JB\r\nAscher. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obs Gynec. 2001; 98(1): 29-34[DOI]
  • 13. Firouznia K\nGhanaati. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 15 pregnancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(6): 1588-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. McLucas B\nGoodwin. Pregnancy following uterine fibroid embolization. Int J of Gynaec Obs. 2001; 74(1): 1-7
  • 15. Cohnen M\r\nPoll, et al. Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 1148-53
  • 16. Nikolic B\r\nSpies. Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology 2000; 214(1): 121-5
  • 17. Bahreyni Toossi MT\r\nMalekzadeh. Radiation dose to newborns in neonatal intensive care units. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9(3): 145-9
  • 18. Nikolic B\r\nAbbara. Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2000; 11: 1173-8
  • 19. Vetter S\r\nSchultz. Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses and effective dose. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(5): 842-8
  • 20. Broadhead DA\r\nChapple. The impact of digital imaging on patient doses during barium studies. Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 992-6
  • 21. Tsapaki V\r\nKottou. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 117(1-3): 93-6
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments