Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Additional Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Evaluate Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer: Correlation with the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Eun Kyung Park 1 , Kyu Ran Cho 1 , * , Bo Kyoung Seo 2 , Ok Hee Woo 3 , Sung Bum Cho 1 and Jeoung Won Bae 4
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Radiology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
3 Department of Radiology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
4 Department of Surgery, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 01, 2016, 13 (1); e33133
  • Published Online: January 16, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 15, 2015
  • Revised: October 21, 2015
  • Accepted: October 26, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.33133

To Cite: Park E K, Cho K R, Seo B K, Woo O H, Cho S B, et al. Additional Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Evaluate Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer: Correlation with the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(1):e33133. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.33133.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, Gao D, Leung S, Snider J, et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(10): 736-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MC, Voduc D, Speers CH, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(20): 3271-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, Dabbs DJ, Decker T, Eusebi V, et al. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res. 2010; 12(4): 207[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, Gao YG, An NY, Ma L, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 16(2): 172-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(6): 1716-22[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, Huang P, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology. 2010; 256(1): 64-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20(4): 654-61[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Choi SY, Chang YW, Park HJ, Kim HJ, Hong SS, Seo DY. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1016)-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Park SH, Choi HY, Hahn SY. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 41(1): 175-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Razek AA, Gaballa G, Denewer A, Nada N. Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors. NMR Biomed. 2010; 23(6): 619-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Cipolla V, Santucci D, Guerrieri D, Drudi FM, Meggiorini ML, de Felice C. Correlation between 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values and grading of invasive breast carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2014; 83(12): 2144-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Martincich L, Deantoni V, Bertotto I, Redana S, Kubatzki F, Sarotto I, et al. Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(7): 1519-28[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. De Felice C, Cipolla V, Guerrieri D, Santucci D, Musella A, Porfiri LM, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014; 35(4): 408-14[PubMed]
  • 14. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. C. W. Elston & I. O. Ellis. Histopathology 1991; 19; 403-410. Histopathology. 2002; 41(3A): 151-2[PubMed]
  • 15. Black R, Prescott R, Bers K, Hawkins A, Stewart H, Forrest P. Tumour cellularity, oestrogen receptors and prognosis in breast cancer. Clin Oncol. 1983; 9(4): 311-8[PubMed]
  • 16. Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ, Ihn YK, Baik JH. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol. 2007; 8(5): 390-6[PubMed]
  • 17. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, Kan S, Hata H, Kuranami M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29(5): 644-9[PubMed]
  • 18. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, Grabner G, Stadlbauer A, Weber M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology. 2009; 253(2): 341-51[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Kim SH, Cha ES, Kim HS, Kang BJ, Choi JJ, Jung JH, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 30(3): 615-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Mori N, Ota H, Mugikura S, Takasawa C, Ishida T, Watanabe G, et al. Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index. Radiology. 2015; 274(1): 66-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Soerjomataram I, Louwman MW, Ribot JG, Roukema JA, Coebergh JW. An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 107(3): 309-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Jeh SK, Kim SH, Kim HS, Kang BJ, Jeong SH, Yim HW, et al. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(1): 102-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M, Kubo H, Bandou Y, Tangoku A, et al. Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med. 2008; 26(1): 15-20[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments