Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Evaluation of Visibility of Foreign Bodies in the Maxillofacial Region: Comparison of Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Solmaz Valizadeh 1 , 2 , Hamidreza Pouraliakbar 2 , Leila Kiani 3 , Yaser Safi 1 and Leila Alibakhshi 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 01, 2016, 13 (4); e37265
  • Published Online: August 10, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 20, 2016
  • Revised: July 17, 2016
  • Accepted: July 25, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.37265

To Cite: Valizadeh S, Pouraliakbar H, Kiani L, Safi Y, Alibakhshi L. Evaluation of Visibility of Foreign Bodies in the Maxillofacial Region: Comparison of Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(4):e37265. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.37265.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Passali D, Gregori D, Lorenzoni G, Cocca S, Loglisci M, Passali FM, et al. Foreign body injuries in children: a review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015; 35(4): 265-71[PubMed]
  • 2. Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS. Foreign bodies. Radiographics. 2003; 23(3): 731-57[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Oikarinen KS, Nieminen TM, Makarainen H, Pyhtinen J. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 22(2): 119-24[PubMed]
  • 4. Akhaddar A, Abouchadi A, Jidal M, Gazzaz M, Elmostarchid B, Naama O, et al. Metallic foreign body in the sphenoid sinus after ballistic injury: a case report. J Neuroradiol. 2008; 35(2): 125-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Dort JC, Robertson D. Nonmetallic foreign bodies of the skull base: a diagnostic challenge. J Otolaryngol. 1995; 24(1): 69-72[PubMed]
  • 6. Aras MH, Miloglu O, Barutcugil C, Kantarci M, Ozcan E, Harorli A. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39(2): 72-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Eggers G, Welzel T, Mukhamadiev D, Wortche R, Hassfeld S, Muhling J. X-ray-based volumetric imaging of foreign bodies: a comparison of computed tomography and digital volume tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(9): 1880-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Fowler TR, Crellin SJ, Greenberg MR. Detecting foreign bodies in a head laceration. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2015; 2015: 801676[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Tas S, Top H. Intraorbital wooden foreign body: clinical analysis of 32 cases, a 10-year experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014; 20(1): 51-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Shepherd M, Lee J, McGahon MC. Diagnostic Modalities for the Detection of Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2007; 29(4): 297-308[DOI]
  • 11. Al-Mujaini A, Al-Senawi R, Ganesh A, Al-Zuhaibi S, Al-Dhuhli H. Intraorbital foreign body: clinical presentation, radiological appearance and management. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2008; 8(1): 69-74[PubMed]
  • 12. Roobottom CA, Weston MJ. The detection of foreign bodies in soft tissue--comparison of conventional and digital radiography. Clin Radiol. 1994; 49(5): 330-2[PubMed]
  • 13. Kaviani F, Javad Rashid R, Shahmoradi Z, Gholamian M. Detection of foreign bodies by spiral computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in maxillofacial regions. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014; 8(3): 166-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Davis J, Czerniski B, Au A, Adhikari S, Farrell I, Fields JM. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Retained Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22(7): 777-87[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Eggers G, Mukhamadiev D, Hassfeld S. Detection of foreign bodies of the head with digital volume tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; 34(2): 74-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Mizel MS, Steinmetz ND, Trepman E. Detection of wooden foreign bodies in muscle tissue: experimental comparison of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(8): 437-43[PubMed]
  • 17. Ober CP, Jones JC, Larson MM, Lanz OI, Werre SR. Comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of acute wooden foreign bodies in the canine manus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008; 49(5): 411-8[PubMed]
  • 18. Shrestha D, Sharma UK, Mohammad R, Dhoju D. The role of ultrasonography in detection and localization of radiolucent foreign body in soft tissues of extremities. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2009; 48(173): 5-9[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments