Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Takeaways from Pre-Contrast T1 and T2 Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer

Seung Hee Han 1 , Yeong Yi An 2 , * , Bong Joo Kang 1 , Sung Hun Kim 1 and Eun Jae Lee 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
2 Department of Radiology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 01, 2016, 13 (4); e36271
  • Published Online: July 18, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 18, 2016
  • Revised: February 18, 2016
  • Accepted: February 23, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.36271

To Cite: Han S H, Yi An Y, Joo Kang B, Hun Kim S, Jae Lee E. Takeaways from Pre-Contrast T1 and T2 Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(4):e36271. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.36271.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001; 220(1): 13-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1994; 190(2): 485-93[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, DeBruhl ND, Sayre J, Farria D, Gorczyca DP, et al. Multifeature analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 7(6): 1016-26[PubMed]
  • 4. Liu PF, Debatin JF, Caduff RF, Kacl G, Garzoli E, Krestin GP. Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. Br J Radiol. 1998; 71(845): 501-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Pediconi F, Miglio E, Telesca M, Luciani ML, Kirchin MA, Passariello R, et al. Effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making and cancer recurrence rates. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47(2): 128-35[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Ballesio L, Savelli S, Angeletti M, Porfiri LM, D'Ambrosio I, Maggi C, et al. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions? Eur J Radiol. 2009; 71(1): 96-101[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, Boettcher J, Marx C, Facius M, et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185(4): 964-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ, Ihn YK, Baik JH. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol. 2007; 8(5): 390-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Partridge SC, Rahbar H, Murthy R, Chai X, Kurland BF, DeMartini WB, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65(6): 1759-67[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Yuen S, Uematsu T, Kasami M, Tanaka K, Kimura K, Sanuki J, et al. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(3): 502-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA. Nonmass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: additional T2-weighted images improve diagnostic accuracy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011; 35(3): 361-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Moran CJ, Hargreaves BA, Saranathan M, Lipson JA, Kao J, Ikeda DM, et al. 3D T2-weighted spin echo imaging in the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 39(2): 332-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7): 1307-18[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Radiology A. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. 2013;
  • 15. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13(6): 889-95[PubMed]
  • 16. Veronesi U, Zurrida S, Viale G, Galimberti V, Arnone P, Nole F. Rethinking TNM: a breast cancer classification to guide to treatment and facilitate research. Breast J. 2009; 15(3): 291-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999; 211(1): 101-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004; 292(22): 2735-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 1989; 171(1): 95-103[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Mahoney MC, Gatsonis C, Hanna L, DeMartini WB, Lehman C. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Radiology. 2012; 264(1): 51-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Bahreini LFE, Guity M. Diagnostic Efficacy of All Series of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Breast MR Images Using Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) Segmentation and Novel Border Feature Extraction for Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Iran J Radiol. 2010; 7(4): 225-34
  • 22. Cho YH, Cho KR, Park EK, Seo BK, Woo OH, Cho SB, et al. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast. Iran J Radiol. 2016; 13(1): 30909[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999; 213(3): 881-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182(2): 473-80[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(4): 994-1000[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179(1): 171-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology. 2006; 238(1): 42-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Cho J, Chung J, Cha ES, Lee JE, Kim JH. Can preoperative 3-T MRI predict nipple-areolar complex involvement in patients with breast cancer? Clin Imaging. 2016; 40(1): 119-24[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments