Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Computed Tomography Colonography Phantom: Construction, Validation and Literature Review

Lukas Lambert 1 , * , Alena Lambertova 1 , 2 , Jan Danes 1 and Gabriela Grusova 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Fourth department of Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 01, 2016, 13 (4); e31069
  • Published Online: July 22, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 28, 2015
  • Revised: September 12, 2015
  • Accepted: October 10, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.31069

To Cite: Lambert L, Lambertova A, Danes J, Grusova G. Computed Tomography Colonography Phantom: Construction, Validation and Literature Review, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(4):e31069. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.31069.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Sunshine JH, Applegate KE. Technology assessment for radiologists. Radiology. 2004; 230(2): 309-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS, Sivri B, Deger A, Akhan O, et al. CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(7): 1657-63[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Karadi C, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RJ, Paik DS, Napel S. Display modes for CT colonography. Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data. Radiology. 1999; 212(1): 195-201[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Branschofsky M, Vogt C, Aurich V, Beck A, Modder U, Cohnen M. Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multi-detector-row CT-colonography: detection of artificial endoluminal lesions in an in-vitro-model with optimization of image quality using a noise reduction filter algorithm. Eur J Med Res. 2006; 11(1): 13-9[PubMed]
  • 5. Dachman AH, Lieberman J, Osnis RB, Chen SY, Hoffmann KR, Chen CT, et al. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography. Radiology. 1997; 203(2): 427-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Choi JI, Kim SH, Kim SH, Park HS, Lee JM, Lee JY, et al. Comparison of accuracy and time-efficiency of CT colonography between conventional and panoramic 3D interpretation methods: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 80(2): 68-75[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Park SH, Choi EK, Lee SS, Byeon JS, Jo JY, Kim YH, et al. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Radiology. 2007; 244(1): 157-64[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Taylor S, Slater A, Honeyfield L, Burling D, Halligan S. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study. Acad Radiol. 2006; 13(7): 850-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Automatic detection of polyps from multislice ct images using 3d morphologic matching algorithm: Phantom study. Medical Imaging 2003. : 877-81
  • 10. Wong KH, Norris JA, Holmes Iii DR, Barton MD, Davis BJ, Bieszczad J, et al. Anatomically correct deformable colon phantom. 2011; 7964: 79642X[DOI]
  • 11. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Meier N, Allkemper T, Klusmeier J, Ludwig K, et al. CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology. 2003; 228(3): 753-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Borchert A, Kugel H, Allkemper T, Osada N, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps: comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom. Radiology. 2006; 241(1): 125-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(1): 126-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Johnson KT, Carston MJ, Wentz RJ, Manduca A, Anderson SM, Johnson CD. Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(1): 29-36[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. de Vries AH, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Stoker J. Influence of tagged fecal material on detectability of colorectal polyps at CT: phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(4): 1101[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Mangiapane F, Piacentini F, Iori S, Passariello R. Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(3): 459-66[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. van Wijk C, Florie J, Nio CY, Dekker E, de Vries AH, Venema HW, et al. Protrusion method for automated estimation of polyp size on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190(5): 1279-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Springer P, Stohr B, Giacomuzzi SM, Bodner G, Klingler A, Jaschke W, et al. Virtual computed tomography colonoscopy: artifacts, image quality and radiation dose load in a cadaver study. Eur Radiol. 2000; 10(1): 183-7[PubMed]
  • 19. Fletcher JG, Booya F, Melton Z, Johnson K, Guendel L, Schmidt B, et al. Automated polyp measurement with CT colonography: preliminary observations in a phantom colon model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(4): 945-52[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Johnson KT, Johnson CD, Anderson SM, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom. Abdom Imaging. 2004; 29(2): 173-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Kim JY, Del Frate C, Magee C, Hahn PF. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology. 2005; 236(1): 118-24[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Virmani S, Lev-Toaff A, Ciancibello L. Automatic polyp detection and measurement with computed tomographic colonography: A phantom study. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2009; 5(3): 15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Punwani S, Halligan S, Irving P, Bloom S, Bungay A, Greenhalgh R, et al. Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate? Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(5): 874-81[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Boyce CJ, Vetter JR, Pickhardt PJ. MDCT artifact related to the intra-scan gravitational flow of opacified luminal fluid (the "Dense Waterfall" sign). Abdom Imaging. 2012; 37(2): 292-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Lambert L, Danes J, Jahoda J, Masek M, Lisy J, Ourednicek P. Submilisievert ultralow-dose CT colonography using iterative reconstruction technique: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol. 2015; 56(5): 517-25[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Love A, Olsson ML, Siemund R, Stalhammar F, Bjorkman-Burtscher IM, Soderberg M. Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol. 2013; 86(1031): 20130388[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, Morley S, Bassett P, Atkin W, et al. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology. 2003; 229(1): 99-108[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Lambert L, Ourednicek P, Jahoda J, Lambertova A, Danes J. Model-based vs hybrid iterative reconstruction technique in ultralow-dose submillisievert CT colonography. Br J Radiol. 2015; 88(1048): 20140667[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Summers RM. Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know? Radiology. 2010; 255(3): 707-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Bretagne JF, Manfredi S, Piette C, Hamonic S, Durand G, Riou F. Yield of high-grade dysplasia based on polyp size detected at colonoscopy: a series of 2295 examinations following a positive fecal occult blood test in a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53(3): 339-45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Nakajima T, Saito Y. Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the predict, resect and discard strategies. Colorectal Disease. 2013; 15(6): 295-300
  • 32. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology. 2005; 236(1): 3-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 33. Yee J, Weinstein S, Morgan T, Alore P, Aslam R. Advances in CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. J Cancer. 2013; 4(3): 200-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 34. Lubner MG, Pooler BD, Kitchin DR, Tang J, Li K, Kim DH, et al. Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25(7): 2089-102[DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013; 51(1): 69-88[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments