Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Computed Tomography Colonography Phantom: Construction, Validation and Literature Review

Lukas Lambert 1 , * , Alena Lambertova 1 , 2 , Jan Danes 1 and Gabriela Grusova 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Fourth department of Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 01, 2016, 13 (4); e31069
  • Published Online: July 22, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 28, 2015
  • Revised: September 12, 2015
  • Accepted: October 10, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.31069

To Cite: Lambert L, Lambertova A, Danes J, Grusova G. Computed Tomography Colonography Phantom: Construction, Validation and Literature Review, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(4):e31069. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.31069.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Sunshine JH, Applegate KE. Technology assessment for radiologists. Radiology. 2004; 230(2): 309-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS, Sivri B, Deger A, Akhan O, et al. CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(7): 1657-63[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Karadi C, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RJ, Paik DS, Napel S. Display modes for CT colonography. Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data. Radiology. 1999; 212(1): 195-201[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Branschofsky M, Vogt C, Aurich V, Beck A, Modder U, Cohnen M. Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multi-detector-row CT-colonography: detection of artificial endoluminal lesions in an in-vitro-model with optimization of image quality using a noise reduction filter algorithm. Eur J Med Res. 2006; 11(1): 13-9[PubMed]
  • 5. Dachman AH, Lieberman J, Osnis RB, Chen SY, Hoffmann KR, Chen CT, et al. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography. Radiology. 1997; 203(2): 427-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Choi JI, Kim SH, Kim SH, Park HS, Lee JM, Lee JY, et al. Comparison of accuracy and time-efficiency of CT colonography between conventional and panoramic 3D interpretation methods: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 80(2): 68-75[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Park SH, Choi EK, Lee SS, Byeon JS, Jo JY, Kim YH, et al. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Radiology. 2007; 244(1): 157-64[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Taylor S, Slater A, Honeyfield L, Burling D, Halligan S. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study. Acad Radiol. 2006; 13(7): 850-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Automatic detection of polyps from multislice ct images using 3d morphologic matching algorithm: Phantom study. Medical Imaging 2003. : 877-81
  • 10. Wong KH, Norris JA, Holmes Iii DR, Barton MD, Davis BJ, Bieszczad J, et al. Anatomically correct deformable colon phantom. 2011; 7964: 79642X[DOI]
  • 11. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Meier N, Allkemper T, Klusmeier J, Ludwig K, et al. CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology. 2003; 228(3): 753-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Borchert A, Kugel H, Allkemper T, Osada N, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps: comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom. Radiology. 2006; 241(1): 125-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(1): 126-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Johnson KT, Carston MJ, Wentz RJ, Manduca A, Anderson SM, Johnson CD. Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(1): 29-36[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. de Vries AH, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Stoker J. Influence of tagged fecal material on detectability of colorectal polyps at CT: phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(4): 1101[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Mangiapane F, Piacentini F, Iori S, Passariello R. Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(3): 459-66[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. van Wijk C, Florie J, Nio CY, Dekker E, de Vries AH, Venema HW, et al. Protrusion method for automated estimation of polyp size on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190(5): 1279-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Springer P, Stohr B, Giacomuzzi SM, Bodner G, Klingler A, Jaschke W, et al. Virtual computed tomography colonoscopy: artifacts, image quality and radiation dose load in a cadaver study. Eur Radiol. 2000; 10(1): 183-7[PubMed]
  • 19. Fletcher JG, Booya F, Melton Z, Johnson K, Guendel L, Schmidt B, et al. Automated polyp measurement with CT colonography: preliminary observations in a phantom colon model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(4): 945-52[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Johnson KT, Johnson CD, Anderson SM, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom. Abdom Imaging. 2004; 29(2): 173-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Kim JY, Del Frate C, Magee C, Hahn PF. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology. 2005; 236(1): 118-24[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Virmani S, Lev-Toaff A, Ciancibello L. Automatic polyp detection and measurement with computed tomographic colonography: A phantom study. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2009; 5(3): 15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Punwani S, Halligan S, Irving P, Bloom S, Bungay A, Greenhalgh R, et al. Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate? Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(5): 874-81[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Boyce CJ, Vetter JR, Pickhardt PJ. MDCT artifact related to the intra-scan gravitational flow of opacified luminal fluid (the "Dense Waterfall" sign). Abdom Imaging. 2012; 37(2): 292-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Lambert L, Danes J, Jahoda J, Masek M, Lisy J, Ourednicek P. Submilisievert ultralow-dose CT colonography using iterative reconstruction technique: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol. 2015; 56(5): 517-25[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Love A, Olsson ML, Siemund R, Stalhammar F, Bjorkman-Burtscher IM, Soderberg M. Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol. 2013; 86(1031): 20130388[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, Morley S, Bassett P, Atkin W, et al. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology. 2003; 229(1): 99-108[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Lambert L, Ourednicek P, Jahoda J, Lambertova A, Danes J. Model-based vs hybrid iterative reconstruction technique in ultralow-dose submillisievert CT colonography. Br J Radiol. 2015; 88(1048): 20140667[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Summers RM. Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know? Radiology. 2010; 255(3): 707-20[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Bretagne JF, Manfredi S, Piette C, Hamonic S, Durand G, Riou F. Yield of high-grade dysplasia based on polyp size detected at colonoscopy: a series of 2295 examinations following a positive fecal occult blood test in a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53(3): 339-45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Nakajima T, Saito Y. Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the predict, resect and discard strategies. Colorectal Disease. 2013; 15(6): 295-300
  • 32. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology. 2005; 236(1): 3-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 33. Yee J, Weinstein S, Morgan T, Alore P, Aslam R. Advances in CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. J Cancer. 2013; 4(3): 200-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 34. Lubner MG, Pooler BD, Kitchin DR, Tang J, Li K, Kim DH, et al. Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25(7): 2089-102[DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. CT colonography: pitfalls in interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013; 51(1): 69-88[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments