Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast

Yun Hee Cho 1 , Kyu Ran Cho 1 , * , Eun Kyung Park 1 , Bo Kyoung Seo 1 , Ok Hee Woo 1 , Sung Bum Cho 1 and Jeoung Won Bae 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 01, 2016, 13 (1); e30909
  • Published Online: January 23, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: June 27, 2015
  • Revised: August 7, 2015
  • Accepted: August 24, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.30909

To Cite: Cho Y H, Cho K R, Park E K, Seo B K, Woo O H, et al. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(1):e30909. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.30909.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Dixon JM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(33): 5640-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Girardi V, Carbognin G, Camera L, Baglio I, Bucci A, Bonetti F, et al. Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Radiol Med. 2011; 116(8): 1226-38[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(19): 3248-58[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, Cruz-Jove E, Putt ME, Solin LJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology. 2003; 226(3): 773-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(13): 1295-303[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(4): 901-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, Kaplan JB, Abramson AF, Menell JH, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(2): 333-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004; 233(3): 830-49[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995; 197(3): 743-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. ACR BI-RADS atlas : breast imaging reporting and data system.
  • 11. Ballesio L, Di Pastena F, Gigli S, D'Ambrosio I, Aceti A, Pontico M, et al. Non mass-like enhancement categories detected by breast MRI and histological findings. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014; 18(6): 910-7[PubMed]
  • 12. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(4): 994-1000[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179(1): 171-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Newell D, Nie K, Chen JH, Hsu CC, Yu HJ, Nalcioglu O, et al. Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20(4): 771-81[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Hochman MG, Langlotz CP, Reynolds CA, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology. 1997; 202(3): 833-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, Langlotz CP, Orel SG, Sullivan D, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169(2): 409-15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, Tsunoda Y, Ogawa T, Abe S, et al. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer. 2008; 15(3): 241-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology. 2006; 238(1): 42-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Shao Z, Wang H, Li X, Liu P, Zhang S, Cao S. Morphological distribution and internal enhancement architecture of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of non-mass-like breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Breast J. 2013; 19(3): 259-68[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(2): 330-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Uematsu T, Kasami M. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(5): 1223-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Wilhelm A, McDonough MD, DePeri ER. Malignancy rates of non-masslike enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging using American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors. Breast J. 2012; 18(6): 523-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Setoguchi T, Okafuji T, Soeda H, et al. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 75(1)-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, Traeber F, Kuhl C. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(9): 2010-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Gity M, Ghazi Moghadam K, Jalali AH, Shakiba M. Association of Different MRI BIRADS Descriptors With Malignancy in Non Mass-Like Breast Lesions. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(12)[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments