Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Measuring the Effect of Filters on Segmentation of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Hasan Erdinc Kocer 1 , Kerim Kursat Cevik 2 , * , Mesut Sivri 3 and Mustafa Koplay 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Electronics and Computer Education, Technical Education Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
2 Department of Computer Programming, Bor Vocational High School, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
3 Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: July 01, 2016, 13 (3); e25491
  • Published Online: February 17, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 6, 2015
  • Revised: May 11, 2015
  • Accepted: May 13, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.25491

To Cite: Kocer H E, Cevik K K, Sivri M, Koplay M. Measuring the Effect of Filters on Segmentation of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(3):e25491. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.25491.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Atalar H, Yavuz OY, Uras I, Gunay, C. , Saylı, U. . Frequency of Evaluation of Developmental Hip Dysplasia Screening Program in Turkey. Turkey Clinics J Med Sci. 2008; 28: 357-60
  • 2. Tosun HB, Bulut M, Karakurt L, Belhan O, Serbest S. Evaluation of the Results of Hip Ultrasonography which Applied for Screening of Developmental Hip Dysplasia. Fırat Med J. 2010; 15(4): 178-83
  • 3. Song KM, Lapinsky A. Determination of hip position in the Pavlik harness. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000; 20(3): 317-9[PubMed]
  • 4. Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT. Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. Pediatrics. 1994; 94(1): 47-52[PubMed]
  • 5. Herring JA. Tachdjian's Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2003; : 513-34
  • 6. Wan MH, Supriyanto E. Comparative evaluation of ultrasound kidney image enhancement techniques. Int J Comput Appl. 2011; 21(7): 15-9
  • 7. Hip joint segmentation from 2D ultrasound data based on dynamic shape priors. Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS international conference on Electronics, control and signal processing. : 245-50
  • 8. Parametric 3D Hip Joint Segmentation for the Diagnosis of Developmental Dysplasia. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS '06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. : 4807-10
  • 9. Application to the Diagnosis of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Analysis of Ultrasound Images Based on Local Statistics. : 2531-4
  • 10. Application of Segmentation and Measurement in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2007. ICBBE 2007. The 1st International Conference on. : 989-91
  • 11. Chan TF, Vese LA. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2001; 10(2): 266-77[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Sapiro G. Geometric partial differential equations and image analysis. 2006; [DOI]
  • 13. Longest PW, Tian G. Transient absorption of inhaled vapors into a multilayer mucus–tissue–blood system. Anns of biomed eng. 2010; 38(2): 517-36
  • 14. Xu C, Prince JL. Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998; 7(3): 359-69[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Chan TF, Sandberg BY, Vese LA. Active Contours without Edges for Vector-Valued Images. J Vis Commun Image Representation. 2000; 11(2): 130-41[DOI]
  • 16. Chesnaud C, Refregier P, Boulet V. Statistical region snake-based segmentation adapted to different physical noise models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1999; 21(11): 1145-57[DOI]
  • 17. Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on. : 430-6
  • 18. Suri JS, Liu K, Singh S, Laxminarayan SN, Zeng X, Reden L. Shape recovery algorithms using level sets in 2-D/3-D medical imagery: a state-of-the-art review. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2002; 6(1): 8-28[PubMed]
  • 19. Osher S, Sethian JA. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 1988; 79(1): 12-49[DOI]
  • 20. Mass segmantation on mammograms using active contours. Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), 2013 21st. : 1-4
  • 21. Narayanan SK, Wahidabanu RSD. A view on despeckling in ultrasound imaging. Int J Signal Processing. 2009; 2(3): 85-98
  • 22. Loupas T, McDicken WN, Allan PL. An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. Circuits and Sys, IEEE Trans on. 1989; 36(1): 129-35
  • 23. Mahmood NH, Razif MR, Gany MT. Comparison between median, unsharp and wiener filter and its effect on ultrasound stomach tissue image segmentation for pyloric stenosis. Inte J Appl Sci Technol. 2011; 1(5)
  • 24. Sarode MV, Deshmukh PR. Reduction of speckle noise and image enhancement of images using filtering technique. Int J AdvancTechnol. 2011; 2(1): 30-8
  • 25. Thangavel K, Manavalan R, Aroquiaraj IL. Removal of speckle noise from ultrasound medical image based on special filters: comparative study. ICGST-GVIP J. 2009; 9(3): 25-32
  • 26. Young IT, van Vliet LJ. Recursive implementation of the Gaussian filter. Signal Processing. 1995; 44(2): 139-51[DOI]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments