Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Low-Dose Computerized Tomography (CT) Imaging of Coronary Artery Stents: Potential Value of Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction

Jie Jiang 1 , Dan Han 1 , * , Li Wu 1 , Xiaojie Xie 1 and Xunran Zhao 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Imaging, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 2017, 14 (4); e24272
  • Published Online: April 27, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 1, 2014
  • Revised: November 15, 2014
  • Accepted: November 17, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24272

To Cite: Jiang J, Han D, Wu L, Xie X, Zhao X. et al. Low-Dose Computerized Tomography (CT) Imaging of Coronary Artery Stents: Potential Value of Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(4):e24272. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24272.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Renker M, Nance JJ, Schoepf UJ, O'Brien TX, Zwerner PL, Meyer M, et al. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology. 2011;260(2):390-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11103574. [PubMed: 21693660].
  • 2. Ebersberger U, Tricarico F, Schoepf UJ, Blanke P, Spears JR, Rowe GW, et al. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2580-5. [PubMed: 22777622].
  • 3. Baker ME, Dong F, Primak A, Obuchowski NA, Einstein D, Gandhi N, et al. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):8-18. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7421. [PubMed: 22733888].
  • 4. Baumueller S, Winklehner A, Karlo C, Goetti R, Flohr T, Russi EW, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(12):2597-606. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2524-0. [PubMed: 22699873].
  • 5. Kalra MK, Woisetschlager M, Dahlstrom N, Singh S, Lindblom M, Choy G, et al. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36(3):339-46. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825586c0. [PubMed: 22592621].
  • 6. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Do S, et al. Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology. 2010;256(1):261-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091487. [PubMed: 20574099].
  • 7. Hur S, Lee JM, Kim SJ, Park JH, Han JK, Choi BI. 80-kVp CT using Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space algorithm for the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: phantom and initial clinical experience. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(2):152-64. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.152. [PubMed: 22438682].
  • 8. Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, Newman R, Perman W, Schneiders N, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys. 1990;17(2):287-95. [PubMed: 2333055].
  • 9. Yang WJ, Pan ZL, Zhang H, Pang LF, Guo Y, Chen KM. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study. Radiol Med. 2011;116(2):189-96. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0599-8. [PubMed: 21076885].
  • 10. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Tatsugami F, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol. 2009;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.010. [PubMed: 19064207].
  • 11. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Schumacher F, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66(1):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.05.013. [PubMed: 17600648].
  • 12. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, Van Meerten EVP, Geleijns J, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR. 2000.
  • 13. Hwang HJ, Seo JB, Lee HJ, Lee SM, Kim EY, Oh SY, et al. Low-dose chest computed tomography with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction, iterative reconstruction in image space, and filtered back projection: studies on image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37(4):610-7. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828f4dae. [PubMed: 23863540].
  • 14. Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, Reddy RP, Zhang C, Yu W, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.012. [PubMed: 22578834].
  • 15. Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Goetti R, et al. Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(12):2521-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2227-y. [PubMed: 21822785].
  • 16. Van Gompel G, Van Slambrouck K, Defrise M, Batenburg KJ, de Mey J, Sijbers J, et al. Iterative correction of beam hardening artifacts in CT. Med Phys. 2011;38 Suppl 1:S36. doi: 10.1118/1.3577758. [PubMed: 21978116].
  • 17. Han BK, Grant KL, Garberich R, Sedlmair M, Lindberg J, Lesser JR. Assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6(3):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.008. [PubMed: 22682262].
  • 18. Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, Renker M, Zwerner PL, O'Brien TX, et al. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(10):2130-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2164-9. [PubMed: 21611758].
  • 19. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):713-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2989. [PubMed: 20729451].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments