Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Low-Dose Computerized Tomography (CT) Imaging of Coronary Artery Stents: Potential Value of Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction

Jie Jiang 1 , Dan Han 1 , * , Li Wu 1 , Xiaojie Xie 1 and Xunran Zhao 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Imaging, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: October 2017, 14 (4); e24272
  • Published Online: April 27, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 1, 2014
  • Revised: November 15, 2014
  • Accepted: November 17, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24272

To Cite: Jiang J, Han D, Wu L, Xie X, Zhao X. Low-Dose Computerized Tomography (CT) Imaging of Coronary Artery Stents: Potential Value of Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(4):e24272. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.24272.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Renker M, Nance JJ, Schoepf UJ, O'Brien TX, Zwerner PL, Meyer M, et al. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology. 2011;260(2):390-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11103574. [PubMed: 21693660].
  • 2. Ebersberger U, Tricarico F, Schoepf UJ, Blanke P, Spears JR, Rowe GW, et al. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):125-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2580-5. [PubMed: 22777622].
  • 3. Baker ME, Dong F, Primak A, Obuchowski NA, Einstein D, Gandhi N, et al. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):8-18. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7421. [PubMed: 22733888].
  • 4. Baumueller S, Winklehner A, Karlo C, Goetti R, Flohr T, Russi EW, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(12):2597-606. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2524-0. [PubMed: 22699873].
  • 5. Kalra MK, Woisetschlager M, Dahlstrom N, Singh S, Lindblom M, Choy G, et al. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36(3):339-46. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825586c0. [PubMed: 22592621].
  • 6. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Do S, et al. Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology. 2010;256(1):261-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091487. [PubMed: 20574099].
  • 7. Hur S, Lee JM, Kim SJ, Park JH, Han JK, Choi BI. 80-kVp CT using Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space algorithm for the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: phantom and initial clinical experience. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(2):152-64. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.152. [PubMed: 22438682].
  • 8. Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, Newman R, Perman W, Schneiders N, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys. 1990;17(2):287-95. [PubMed: 2333055].
  • 9. Yang WJ, Pan ZL, Zhang H, Pang LF, Guo Y, Chen KM. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study. Radiol Med. 2011;116(2):189-96. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0599-8. [PubMed: 21076885].
  • 10. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Tatsugami F, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol. 2009;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.010. [PubMed: 19064207].
  • 11. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Schumacher F, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66(1):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.05.013. [PubMed: 17600648].
  • 12. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, Van Meerten EVP, Geleijns J, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR. 2000.
  • 13. Hwang HJ, Seo JB, Lee HJ, Lee SM, Kim EY, Oh SY, et al. Low-dose chest computed tomography with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction, iterative reconstruction in image space, and filtered back projection: studies on image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37(4):610-7. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828f4dae. [PubMed: 23863540].
  • 14. Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, Reddy RP, Zhang C, Yu W, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.012. [PubMed: 22578834].
  • 15. Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Goetti R, et al. Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(12):2521-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2227-y. [PubMed: 21822785].
  • 16. Van Gompel G, Van Slambrouck K, Defrise M, Batenburg KJ, de Mey J, Sijbers J, et al. Iterative correction of beam hardening artifacts in CT. Med Phys. 2011;38 Suppl 1:S36. doi: 10.1118/1.3577758. [PubMed: 21978116].
  • 17. Han BK, Grant KL, Garberich R, Sedlmair M, Lindberg J, Lesser JR. Assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6(3):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.008. [PubMed: 22682262].
  • 18. Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, Renker M, Zwerner PL, O'Brien TX, et al. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(10):2130-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2164-9. [PubMed: 21611758].
  • 19. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):713-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2989. [PubMed: 20729451].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments