Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Can the Inversion Filter Improve the Visibility of the Mandibular Incisive Canal?

Farida Abesi 1 , Nima Nikafshar 2 , Sina Haghanifar 3 , * , Soraya Khafri 4 and Mahtab Hamzeh 5
Authors Information
1 Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
3 Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
4 Social Medical and Health Department, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
5 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 01, 2016, 13 (1); e22698
  • Published Online: January 12, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 13, 2014
  • Revised: June 25, 2015
  • Accepted: July 5, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.22698

To Cite: Abesi F, Nikafshar N, Haghanifar S, Khafri S, Hamzeh M. Can the Inversion Filter Improve the Visibility of the Mandibular Incisive Canal?, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(1):e22698. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.22698.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol. 2006; 77(12): 1933-43[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Preeti C, Arshdeep K, Balwinder S, Ramandeep S, Adesh S, Aman A. A study of the anterior loop and the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs. Ind J Compr Dent Care. 2013; 3(1): 316-20
  • 3. Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Roosta S, Haghnegahdar A. Mandibular Incisive Canal in Panoramic View. J Dent, Shiraz Univ Medic Sci. 2008; 8(4): 66-75
  • 4. Romanos GE, Papadimitriou DE, Royer K, Stefanova-Stephens N, Salwan R, Malmstrom H, et al. The presence of the mandibular incisive canal: a panoramic radiographic examination. Implant Dent. 2012; 21(3): 202-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Sahman H, Sekerci AE, Sisman Y, Payveren M. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(1): 71-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Raitz R, Shimura E, Chilvarquer I, Fenyo-Pereira M. Assessment of the mandibular incisive canal by panoramic radiograph and cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Dent. 2014; 2014: 187085[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Cantekin K, Sekerci AE, Miloglu O, Buyuk SK. Identification of the mandibular landmarks in a pediatric population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014; 19(2)-41[PubMed]
  • 8. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Gijbels F, Quirynen M. Appearance, location, course, and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: an assessment on spiral CT scan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002; 31(5): 322-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Uchida Y, Noguchi N, Goto M, Yamashita Y, Hanihara T, Takamori H, et al. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(4): 744-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Huang H, Liu P, Li X, Pei Z, Yang X, Bai S, et al. [Mandibular incisive canal by cone beam CT]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013; 31(5): 479-82[PubMed]
  • 11. Raitz R, Assuncao Junior JN, Fenyo-Pereira M, Correa L, de Lima LP. Assessment of using digital manipulation tools for diagnosing mandibular radiolucent lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(3): 203-10[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Blackwell HR. Contrast thresholds of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am. 1946; 36(11): 624-43[PubMed]
  • 13. van der Stelt PF. Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136(10): 1379-87[PubMed]
  • 14. Oliveira ML, Vieira ML, Cruz AD, Boscolo FN, Almeida SMD. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length. Braz Dent J. 2012; 23(6): 703-6[PubMed]
  • 15. Kal BI, Baksi BG, Dundar N, Sen BH. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(2): 280-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Kamburoglu K, Murat S, Pehlivan SY. The effects of digital image enhancement on the detection of vertical root fracture. Dent Traumatol. 2010; 26(1): 47-51[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Haak R, Wicht MJ. Grey-scale reversed radiographic display in the detection of approximal caries. J Dent. 2005; 33(1): 65-71[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments