Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Radiation Dose to the Thyroid and Gonads in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography

Hamid Behroozi 1 , * , Mohammad Davoodi 1 and Shahriar Aghasi 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 01, 2015, 12 (2); e20619
  • Published Online: February 9, 2015
  • Article Type: Research ArticleCARDIAC IMAGING
  • Received: May 28, 2014
  • Revised: July 5, 2014
  • Accepted: July 13, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.20619

To Cite: Behroozi H, Davoodi M, Aghasi S. Radiation Dose to the Thyroid and Gonads in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography, Iran J Radiol. 2015 ; 12(2):e20619. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.20619.

Copyright © 2015, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). 2013;
  • 2. Minino AM, Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011; 59(10): 1-126[PubMed]
  • 3. Cook S, Walker A, Hugli O, Togni M, Meier B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 96(6): 375-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Bushong SC. Radiologic Science for Technologists. 2008;
  • 5. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, Wilde P, Oberhoff M, Karsch KR, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47(9): 1840-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 1999; 99(17): 2345-57[PubMed]
  • 7. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, van Ooijen P, Munne A, van Geuns RJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet. 2001; 357(9256): 599-603[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Mahesh M, Cody D. . Physics of cardiac imaging with multiple-row detector computed tomography. 2009;
  • 9. Shortt CP, Fanning NF, Malone L, Thornton J, Brennan P, Lee MJ. Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007; 30(5): 922-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Bahreyni Toossi MT, Zare H, Bayani S, Esmaili S. Organ and effective doses of patients arising from coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at two hospitals in Mashhad-Iran. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008; 128(3): 363-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007; 298(3): 317-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Doolan A, Brennan PC, Rainford LA, Healy J. Gonad protection for the antero-posterior projection of the pelvis in diagnostic radiography in Dublin hospitals. Radiography. 2004; 10(1): 15-21[DOI]
  • 13. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, Dubinsky TJ, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008; 248(2): 431-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Seeram E. . Computed tomography, physical principles, clinical applications and quality control. 2009;
  • 15. Sabarudin A, Sun Z, Ng KH. Radiation dose associated with coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography: an experimental study of the effect of dose-saving strategies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012; 150(2): 180-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. McLaughlin DJ, Mooney RB. Dose reduction to radiosensitive tissues in CT. Do commercially available shields meet the users' needs? Clin Radiol. 2004; 59(5): 446-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Nikolic B, Khosa F, Lin PJ, Khan AN, Sarwar S, Yam CS, et al. Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(6): 1347-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Hohl C, Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Das M, Stargardt A, Muhlenbruch G, et al. Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(1): 128-30[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments