Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Radiation Dose to the Thyroid and Gonads in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography

Hamid Behroozi 1 , * , Mohammad Davoodi 1 and Shahriar Aghasi 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 01, 2015, 12 (2); e20619
  • Published Online: February 9, 2015
  • Article Type: Research ArticleCARDIAC IMAGING
  • Received: May 28, 2014
  • Revised: July 5, 2014
  • Accepted: July 13, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.20619

To Cite: Behroozi H, Davoodi M, Aghasi S. Radiation Dose to the Thyroid and Gonads in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography, Iran J Radiol. 2015 ; 12(2):e20619. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.20619.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
  • 1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). 2013;
  • 2. Minino AM, Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011; 59(10): 1-126[PubMed]
  • 3. Cook S, Walker A, Hugli O, Togni M, Meier B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 96(6): 375-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Bushong SC. Radiologic Science for Technologists. 2008;
  • 5. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, Wilde P, Oberhoff M, Karsch KR, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47(9): 1840-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 1999; 99(17): 2345-57[PubMed]
  • 7. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, van Ooijen P, Munne A, van Geuns RJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet. 2001; 357(9256): 599-603[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Mahesh M, Cody D. . Physics of cardiac imaging with multiple-row detector computed tomography. 2009;
  • 9. Shortt CP, Fanning NF, Malone L, Thornton J, Brennan P, Lee MJ. Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007; 30(5): 922-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Bahreyni Toossi MT, Zare H, Bayani S, Esmaili S. Organ and effective doses of patients arising from coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at two hospitals in Mashhad-Iran. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008; 128(3): 363-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007; 298(3): 317-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Doolan A, Brennan PC, Rainford LA, Healy J. Gonad protection for the antero-posterior projection of the pelvis in diagnostic radiography in Dublin hospitals. Radiography. 2004; 10(1): 15-21[DOI]
  • 13. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, Dubinsky TJ, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008; 248(2): 431-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Seeram E. . Computed tomography, physical principles, clinical applications and quality control. 2009;
  • 15. Sabarudin A, Sun Z, Ng KH. Radiation dose associated with coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography: an experimental study of the effect of dose-saving strategies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012; 150(2): 180-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. McLaughlin DJ, Mooney RB. Dose reduction to radiosensitive tissues in CT. Do commercially available shields meet the users' needs? Clin Radiol. 2004; 59(5): 446-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Nikolic B, Khosa F, Lin PJ, Khan AN, Sarwar S, Yam CS, et al. Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(6): 1347-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Hohl C, Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Das M, Stargardt A, Muhlenbruch G, et al. Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(1): 128-30[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments