Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions

Cigdem Devir 1 , Mahmut Kebapci 2 , Tuncer Temel 3 , * and Aysegul Ozakyol 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Research and Training Hospital, Kutahya Dumlupinar University, Kutahya, Turkey
2 Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Faculty, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 01, 2016, 13 (1); e19518
  • Published Online: January 7, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 16, 2014
  • Revised: August 16, 2014
  • Accepted: August 29, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.19518

To Cite: Devir C, Kebapci M, Temel T, Ozakyol A. Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(1):e19518. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.19518.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology. 2001; 219(3): 685-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Chung DJ, Huh KC, Choi WJ, Kim JK. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(1): 98-103[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Waye JD, Bashkoff E. Total colonoscopy: is it always possible? Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37(2): 152-4[PubMed]
  • 4. Vining DJ, Gelfand DW. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 162: 104
  • 5. Bakir B, Yekeler E, Tunaci M, Tunaci A, Acunas B, Acunas G. [Diagnostic efficiency of multislice computed tomography colonography in the detection of colorectal tumors: comparison with conventional colonography]. Tani Girisim Radyol. 2004; 10(3): 218-29[PubMed]
  • 6. Ferrucci JT. Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177(5): 975-88[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Barish MA, Rocha TC. Multislice CT colonography: current status and limitations. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005; 43(6): 1049-62[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(3): 786-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Reed JE, Hara AK. CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172(5): 1271-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, Milano A, Dicker M, Megibow AJ, et al. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology. 2001; 218(1): 274-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology. 2002; 224(2): 393-403[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(23): 2191-200[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology. 2000; 217(3): 765-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Macari M, Bini EJ. CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology. 2005; 237(3): 819-33[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Harmsen WS, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001; 219(3): 693-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12(3): 525-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Fenlon HM, Barish MA, Ferrucci JT. Virtual colonoscopy--technique and applications. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 31(8): 713-20[PubMed]
  • 18. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J, Meuli R, Pantoflickova D, Duvoisin B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut. 2000; 47(1): 126-30[PubMed]
  • 19. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, Ehman RL, et al. Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168(5): 1181-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, Samara Y, Hoffmann KR, Rubin DT, et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171(4): 989-95[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127(5): 1300-11[PubMed]
  • 22. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, MacCarty RL, Ahlquist DA, Reed JE, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology. 2000; 216(3): 704-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Wall SD. The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173(1): 169-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW, Florie J, Nio CY, Glas AS, et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology. 2003; 228(3): 878-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. McFarland EG. Reader strategies for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2002; 27(3): 275-83[PubMed]
  • 26. Rottgen R, Fischbach F, Plotkin M, Lorenz M, Freund T, Schroder RJ, et al. CT colonography using different reconstruction modi. Clin Imaging. 2005; 29(3): 195-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Sorantin E, Werkgartner G, Balogh E, Vilanova i Bartroli A, Palagyi K, Nyul LG, et al. Virtual Dissection and Automated Polyp Detection of the Colon Based on Spiral CT - Techniques and Preliminary Experience on a Cadaveric Phantom. European Surg Acta Chir Austriaca. 2002; 34(2): 143-9[DOI]
  • 28. Yoshida H, Dachman AH. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2005; 30(1): 26-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Nicholson FB, Taylor S, Halligan S, Kamm MA. Recent developments in CT colonography. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60(1): 1-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Halligan S, Taylor SA. CT colonography: results and limitations. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 61(3): 400-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Domagk D, Lugering N, Neumann E, Heindel W. Colorectal polyps: Detection with multi-slice CT colonography. Rofo. 2001; 173(12): 1069-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ehman RL, Ilstrup DM. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. Radiology. 1996; 200(1): 49-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 33. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, Milano A, Katz SS, Resnick D, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology. 2002; 224(2): 383-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 34. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy P3, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(20): 1496-503[DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005; 237(3): 893-904[DOI][PubMed]
  • 36. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002; 222(2): 337-45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 37. Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology. 1999; 210(2): 423-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 38. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, Maccarty RL, Welch TJ, Vanness DJ, et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124(4): 911-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 39. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology. 2000; 215(2): 353-7[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments