Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions

Cigdem Devir 1 , Mahmut Kebapci 2 , Tuncer Temel 3 , * and Aysegul Ozakyol 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Research and Training Hospital, Kutahya Dumlupinar University, Kutahya, Turkey
2 Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Faculty, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 01, 2016, 13 (1); e19518
  • Published Online: January 7, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 16, 2014
  • Revised: August 16, 2014
  • Accepted: August 29, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.19518

To Cite: Devir C, Kebapci M, Temel T, Ozakyol A. Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions, Iran J Radiol. 2016 ; 13(1):e19518. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.19518.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnote
References
  • 1. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology. 2001; 219(3): 685-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Chung DJ, Huh KC, Choi WJ, Kim JK. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(1): 98-103[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Waye JD, Bashkoff E. Total colonoscopy: is it always possible? Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37(2): 152-4[PubMed]
  • 4. Vining DJ, Gelfand DW. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 162: 104
  • 5. Bakir B, Yekeler E, Tunaci M, Tunaci A, Acunas B, Acunas G. [Diagnostic efficiency of multislice computed tomography colonography in the detection of colorectal tumors: comparison with conventional colonography]. Tani Girisim Radyol. 2004; 10(3): 218-29[PubMed]
  • 6. Ferrucci JT. Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177(5): 975-88[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Barish MA, Rocha TC. Multislice CT colonography: current status and limitations. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005; 43(6): 1049-62[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(3): 786-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Reed JE, Hara AK. CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172(5): 1271-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, Milano A, Dicker M, Megibow AJ, et al. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology. 2001; 218(1): 274-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology. 2002; 224(2): 393-403[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(23): 2191-200[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology. 2000; 217(3): 765-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Macari M, Bini EJ. CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology. 2005; 237(3): 819-33[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Harmsen WS, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001; 219(3): 693-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12(3): 525-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Fenlon HM, Barish MA, Ferrucci JT. Virtual colonoscopy--technique and applications. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 31(8): 713-20[PubMed]
  • 18. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J, Meuli R, Pantoflickova D, Duvoisin B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut. 2000; 47(1): 126-30[PubMed]
  • 19. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, Ehman RL, et al. Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168(5): 1181-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, Samara Y, Hoffmann KR, Rubin DT, et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171(4): 989-95[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127(5): 1300-11[PubMed]
  • 22. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, MacCarty RL, Ahlquist DA, Reed JE, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology. 2000; 216(3): 704-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Wall SD. The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173(1): 169-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW, Florie J, Nio CY, Glas AS, et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology. 2003; 228(3): 878-85[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. McFarland EG. Reader strategies for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2002; 27(3): 275-83[PubMed]
  • 26. Rottgen R, Fischbach F, Plotkin M, Lorenz M, Freund T, Schroder RJ, et al. CT colonography using different reconstruction modi. Clin Imaging. 2005; 29(3): 195-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Sorantin E, Werkgartner G, Balogh E, Vilanova i Bartroli A, Palagyi K, Nyul LG, et al. Virtual Dissection and Automated Polyp Detection of the Colon Based on Spiral CT - Techniques and Preliminary Experience on a Cadaveric Phantom. European Surg Acta Chir Austriaca. 2002; 34(2): 143-9[DOI]
  • 28. Yoshida H, Dachman AH. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2005; 30(1): 26-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Nicholson FB, Taylor S, Halligan S, Kamm MA. Recent developments in CT colonography. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60(1): 1-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Halligan S, Taylor SA. CT colonography: results and limitations. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 61(3): 400-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Domagk D, Lugering N, Neumann E, Heindel W. Colorectal polyps: Detection with multi-slice CT colonography. Rofo. 2001; 173(12): 1069-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ehman RL, Ilstrup DM. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. Radiology. 1996; 200(1): 49-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 33. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, Milano A, Katz SS, Resnick D, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology. 2002; 224(2): 383-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 34. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy P3, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(20): 1496-503[DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005; 237(3): 893-904[DOI][PubMed]
  • 36. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002; 222(2): 337-45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 37. Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology. 1999; 210(2): 423-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 38. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, Maccarty RL, Welch TJ, Vanness DJ, et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124(4): 911-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 39. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology. 2000; 215(2): 353-7[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments