Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Better Visualization of Vermiform Appendix With Tissue Harmonic Imaging Compared to Conventional Sonography

Mikail Inal 1 , * , Birsen Unal 1 and Yasemin Karadeniz Bilgili 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Kirikkale University School of Medicine, Kirikkale, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: December 01, 2014, 11 (4); e18114
  • Published Online: September 23, 2014
  • Article Type: Research ArticleABDOMINAL IMAGING
  • Received: February 9, 2014
  • Revised: April 16, 2014
  • Accepted: April 30, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.18114

To Cite: Inal M, Unal B, Karadeniz Bilgili Y. Better Visualization of Vermiform Appendix With Tissue Harmonic Imaging Compared to Conventional Sonography, Iran J Radiol. 2014 ; 11(4):e18114. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.18114.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
  • 1. Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffrey RB, Jr.. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology. 2002; 225(1): 131-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ. Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg. 1992; 158(1): 37-41[PubMed]
  • 3. Velanovich V, Harkabus MA, Tapia FV, Gusz JR, Vallance SR. When it's not appendicitis. Am Surg. 1998; 64(1): 7-11[PubMed]
  • 4. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg. 1999; 229(3): 344-9[PubMed]
  • 5. Kan JH, Fines BP, Funaki B. Conventional and hydrocolonic US of the appendix with CT correlation performed by on-call radiology residents. Acad Radiol. 2001; 8(12): 1208-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB, Jr., Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology. 1999; 213(2): 341-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Yetkin G, Basak M, Isgor A, Kebudi A, Akgun I. Can negative appendectomy rate be decreased by using spiral computed tomography without contrast material? Acta Chir Belg. 2002; 102(5): 334-7[PubMed]
  • 8. Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178(6): 1319-25[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology. 1994; 190(1): 31-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG, Hart MJ. A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. Am J Surg. 2000; 179(5): 379-81[PubMed]
  • 11. Fujii Y, Hata J, Futagami K, Hamada T, Mitsuoka H, Teramen K, et al. Ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis and provides cost savings to hospitals in Japan. J Ultrasound Med. 2000; 19(6): 409-14[PubMed]
  • 12. Chen SC, Chen KM, Wang SM, Chang KJ. Abdominal sonography screening of clinically diagnosed or suspected appendicitis before surgery. World J Surg. 1998; 22(5): 449-52[PubMed]
  • 13. Uebel P, Weiss H, Trimborn CP, Fiedler L, Bersch W. [Ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis--possibilities and limits of the method--results of prospective and retrospective clinical studies]. Ultraschall Med. 1996; 17(3): 100-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Schwerk WB. [Ultrasound first in acute appendix? Unnecessary laparotomies can often be avoided]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2000; 142(26-27): 29-32[PubMed]
  • 15. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Gritzmann N, Gotwald T, Schwamberger K, Ulmer H, et al. Appendicitis: should diagnostic imaging be performed if the clinical presentation is highly suggestive of the disease? Gastroenterology. 2002; 123(4): 992-8[PubMed]
  • 16. Himeno S, Yasuda S, Oida Y, Mukoyama S, Nishi T, Mukai M, et al. Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2003; 28(1): 39-44[PubMed]
  • 17. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Gritzmann N. [Ultrasonography of the normal vermiform appendix]. Ultraschall Med. 1997; 18(3): 139-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Lee JH, Jeong YK, Hwang JC, Ham SY, Yang SO. Graded compression sonography with adjuvant use of a posterior manual compression technique in the sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178(4): 863-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Lehmann D, Uebel P, Weiss H, Fiedler L, Bersch W. [Sonographic representation of the normal and acute inflamed appendix--in patients wi right-sided abdominal pain]. Ultraschall Med. 2000; 21(3): 101-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Rioux M. Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158(4): 773-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Tarantino L, Giorgio A, de Stefano G, Scala V, Esposito F, Liorre G, et al. Acute appendicitis mimicking infectious enteritis: diagnostic value of sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(9): 945-50[PubMed]
  • 22. Simonovsky V. [Detection of acute appendicitis using ultrasonography]. Rozhl Chir. 2000; 79(5): 215-20[PubMed]
  • 23. Gough IR, Morris MI, Pertnikovs EI, Murray MR, Smith MB, Bestmann MS. Consequences of removal of a "normal" appendix. Med J Aust. 1983; 1(8): 370-2[PubMed]
  • 24. Walker SJ, West CR, Colmer MR. Acute appendicitis: does removal of a normal appendix matter, what is the value of diagnostic accuracy and is surgical delay important? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995; 77(5): 358-63[PubMed]
  • 25. Ward B, Baker AC, Humphrey VF. Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 101(1): 143-54[PubMed]
  • 26. Hann LE, Bach AM, Cramer LD, Siegel D, Yoo HH, Garcia R. Hepatic sonography: comparison of tissue harmonic and standard sonography techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173(1): 201-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Shapiro RS, Wagreich J, Parsons RB, Stancato-Pasik A, Yeh HC, Lao R. Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171(5): 1203-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Oktar SO, Yucel C, Ozdemir H, Uluturk A, Isik S. Comparison of conventional sonography, real-time compound sonography, tissue harmonic sonography, and tissue harmonic compound sonography of abdominal and pelvic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181(5): 1341-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Grunditz T, Ryden CI, Janzon L. Does the retrocecal position influence the course of acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand. 1983; 149(7): 707-10[PubMed]
  • 30. Josephson T, Styrud J, Eriksson S. Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. Body mass index as selection factor for US examination. Acta Radiol. 2000; 41(5): 486-8[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments