Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

The Value of Prostate MRI with Endorectal Coil in Detecting Seminal Vesicle Involvement in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Mahyar Ghafoori 1 , 2 , Manijeh Alavi 3 , * , Madjid Shakiba 2 and Kamal Hoseini 4
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Hazrat Rasoul Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Deputy of Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Hazrat Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 01, 2015, 12 (1); e14556
  • Published Online: December 20, 2014
  • Article Type: Research ArticleUROGENITAL IMAGING & CONTRAST MEDIA
  • Received: August 30, 2013
  • Revised: September 14, 2013
  • Accepted: September 24, 2013
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14556

To Cite: Ghafoori M, Alavi M, Shakiba M, Hoseini K. The Value of Prostate MRI with Endorectal Coil in Detecting Seminal Vesicle Involvement in Patients with Prostate Cancer, Iran J Radiol. 2015 ; 12(1):e14556. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14556.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Jung AJ, Westphalen AC. Imaging prostate cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012; 50(6): 1043-59[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Ghafoori M, Varedi P, Hosseini SJ, Asgari M, Shakiba M. Value of prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density in detection of prostate cancer in an Iranian population of men. Urol J. 2009; 6(3): 182-8[PubMed]
  • 3. Ghafoori M, Shakiba M, Seifmanesh H, Hoseini K. Decrease in infection rate following use of povidone-iodine during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9(2): 67-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Lee HW, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY. Can we predict real T3 stage prostate cancer in patients with clinical T3 (cT3) disease before radical prostatectomy? Yonsei Med J. 2010; 51(5): 700-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Vilanova JC, Comet J, Garcia-Figueiras R, Barcelo J, Boada M. [Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer]. Radiologia. 2010; 52(6): 513-24[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Mueller-Lisse UG, Miller K. [Imaging modalities for primary diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer]. Urologe A. 2010; 49(2): 190-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Afnan J, Tempany CM. Update on prostate imaging. Urol Clin North Am. 2010; 37(1): 23-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Kayhan A, Fan X, Oto A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 20(2): 105-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Verma S, Rajesh A, Futterer JJ, Turkbey B, Scheenen TW, Pang Y, et al. Prostate MRI and 3D MR spectroscopy: how we do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(6): 1414-26[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Kim B, Breau RH, Papadatos D, Fergusson D, Doucette S, Cagiannos I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010; 4(4): 257-62[PubMed]
  • 11. Namiki S, Tochigi T, Ishidoya S, Ito A, Numata I, Arai Y. Long-term quality of life following primary treatment in men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. Qual Life Res. 2011; 20(1): 111-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Park SY, Kim JJ, Kim TH, Lim SH, Han DH, Park BK, et al. The role of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in predicting extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion in clinically localized prostate cancer. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51(5): 308-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Wetter A, Ajdukovic AN, Fliessbach K, Lehnert T, Engl T, Jacobi V, et al. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level]. Rofo. 2006; 178(4): 385-90[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Lee SH, Park KK, Choi KH, Lim BJ, Kim JH, Lee SW, et al. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging. World J Urol. 2010; 28(6): 667-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Futterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Jager GJ, Hulsbergen-van De Kaa CA, Witjes JA, et al. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. Radiology. 2005; 237(2): 541-9[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments