Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis

Xiao Zhi Zheng 1 , Bin Yang 2 , * and Jing Wu 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (The First People’s Hospital of Yancheng), Yancheng, P.R China
2 Department of Ultrasound, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing City, P.R China
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 01, 2015, 12 (1); e11405
  • Published Online: September 30, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 5, 2013
  • Revised: June 2, 2013
  • Accepted: June 11, 2013
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.11405

To Cite: Zheng X Z, Yang B, Wu J. Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis, Iran J Radiol. 2015 ;12(1):e11405. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.11405.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Vrublevsky AV, Boshchenko AA, Karpov RS. Reduced coronary flow reserve in the coronary sinus is a predictor of hemodynamically significant stenoses of the left coronary artery territory. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004; 5(4): 294-303[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Vrublevsky AV, Boshchenko AA, Karpov RS. Simultaneous transesophageal Doppler assessment of coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery and coronary sinus allows differentiation between proximal and non-proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004; 5(1): 25-33[PubMed]
  • 3. Ramos Filho J, Ramires JA, Turina M, Medeiros CJ, Lachat M, Tsutsui J. Study of coronary sinus flow reserve through transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in normal subjects. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2002; 79(2): 97-106[PubMed]
  • 4. Hood WB, Jr. Regional venous drainage of the human heart. Br Heart J. 1968; 30(1): 105-9[PubMed]
  • 5. Zheng X, Ji P, Mao H, Hu J. Reduced antegrade flow in the coronary sinus is a predictor of coronary artery stenosis in hypertensive patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31(1): 7-14[PubMed]
  • 6. Bloch KM, Carlsson M, Arheden H, Stahlberg F. Quantifying coronary sinus flow and global LV perfusion at 3T. BMC Med Imaging. 2009; 9: 9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Zheng XZ, Ji P, Mao HW. Reduced difference in left ventricular mass at end diastole and peak systole is a predictor of major stenosis of the left coronary artery territory. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31(9): 1437-42[PubMed]
  • 8. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57(6): 450-8[PubMed]
  • 9. Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography. I. A percutaneous transfemoral technic. Radiology. 1967; 89(5): 815-24[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Akalin EN, Yaylali O, Kirac FS, Yuksel D, Kilic M. The Role of Myocardial Perfusion Gated SPECT Study in Women with Coronary Artery Disease: A Correlative Study. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2012; 21(2): 69-74[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Petcherski O, Gaspar T, Halon DA, Peled N, Jaffe R, Molnar R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using invasive quantitative coronary angiography as reference standard. Am J Cardiol. 2013; 111(4): 510-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Celutkiene J, Zakarkaite D, Skorniakov V, Zvironaite V, Grabauskiene V, Burca J, et al. Quantitative approach using multiple single parameters versus visual assessment in dobutamine stress echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012; 10: 31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Moonen M, Lancellotti P, Zacharakis D, Pierard L. The value of 2D strain imaging during stress testing. Echocardiography. 2009; 26(3): 307-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Thorstensen A, Amundsen BH, Dalen H, Hala P, Kiss G, Aase SA, et al. Strain rate imaging combined with wall motion analysis gives incremental value in direct quantification of myocardial infarct size. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 13(11): 914-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Valocik G, Valocikova I, Mitro P, Fojtikova L, Druzbacka L, Kristofova B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of global myocardial deformation indexes in coronary artery disease: a velocity vector imaging study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 28(8): 1931-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Lepper W, Belcik T, Wei K, Lindner JR, Sklenar J, Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation. 2004; 109(25): 3132-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Liu ZB, Tan YP, Fang P, Song W, Wu SB, Cong Y. Detection and reproducibility of coronary sinus with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Chin J Med Imaging Technol. 2005; 12(21): 1888-90
  • 18. Fang P, Tan YP, Liu ZB, Wu SB, Cong Y. Observation of blood flow changes in coronary sinus by transthoracic echocardiography before and after coronary artery interventional therapy. Acad J Sec Mil Med Univ. 2007; 28(3): 335-6
  • 19. Schwitter J, DeMarco T, Kneifel S, von Schulthess GK, Jorg MC, Arheden H, et al. Magnetic resonance-based assessment of global coronary flow and flow reserve and its relation to left ventricular functional parameters: a comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2000; 101(23): 2696-702[PubMed]
  • 20. Koskenvuo JW, Hartiala JJ, Knuuti J, Sakuma H, Toikka JO, Komu M, et al. Assessing coronary sinus blood flow in patients with coronary artery disease: a comparison of phase-contrast MR imaging with positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177(5): 1161-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Koskenvuo JW, Sakuma H, Niemi P, Toikka JO, Knuuti J, Laine H, et al. Global myocardial blood flow and global flow reserve measurements by MRI and PET are comparable. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 13(3): 361-6[PubMed]
  • 22. Myerson SG, Montgomery HE, World MJ, Pennell DJ. Left ventricular mass: reliability of M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiographic formulas. Hypertension. 2002; 40(5): 673-8[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments