Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Optimization of Scan and Reconstruction Parameters for Renal Artery CT Angiography with Iterative Reconstruction at Low kVp Compared with Filtered Back Projection at 120 kVp Acquisition

Pinggui Lei 1 , Jun Jiao 1 , Xiaolin Wang 1 , * , Qinghong Duan 1 , Xun Zou 1 , Hui Feng 1 , Jujiang Mao 1 and Pingxian Wang 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang of Guizhou, China
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 2018, 15 (2); e14860
  • Published Online: April 25, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 12, 2017
  • Revised: January 15, 2018
  • Accepted: January 29, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14860

To Cite: Lei P, Jiao J, Wang X, Duan Q, Zou X, et al. Optimization of Scan and Reconstruction Parameters for Renal Artery CT Angiography with Iterative Reconstruction at Low kVp Compared with Filtered Back Projection at 120 kVp Acquisition, Iran J Radiol. 2018 ; 15(2):e14860. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14860.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Israel GM, Silverman SG. The incidental renal mass. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011;49(2):369-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.10.007. [PubMed: 21333783].
  • 2. Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie JP. Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology. 2008;249(1):16-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491070783. [PubMed: 18796665].
  • 3. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology. 2005;236(2):441-50. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2362040218. [PubMed: 16040900].
  • 4. Mileto A, Nelson RC, Paulson EK, Marin D. Dual-Energy MDCT for Imaging the Renal Mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(6):W640-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.14094. [PubMed: 25730444].
  • 5. Mileto A, Marin D, Nelson RC, Ascenti G, Boll DT. Dual energy MDCT assessment of renal lesions: an overview. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(2):353-62. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3030-8. [PubMed: 24092045].
  • 6. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. [PubMed: 18046031].
  • 7. Schabel C, Fenchel M, Schmidt B, Flohr TG, Wuerslin C, Thomas C, et al. Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(2):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.08.015. [PubMed: 23099242].
  • 8. Baker ME, Dong F, Primak A, Obuchowski NA, Einstein D, Gandhi N, et al. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):8-18. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7421. [PubMed: 22733888].
  • 9. Li B, Behrman RH. Comment on the "report of AAPM TG 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations" [report of AAPM TG 204, 2011]. Med Phys. 2012;39(7):4613-4. author reply 4615-6. doi: 10.1118/1.4725756. [PubMed: 22830792].
  • 10. Habib Geryes B, Calmon R, Khraiche D, Boddaert N, Bonnet D, Raimondi F. Radiation dose reduction in paediatric coronary computed tomography: assessment of effective dose and image quality. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(7):2030-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4032-5. [PubMed: 26433957].
  • 11. Cohen MD. ALARA, image gently and CT-induced cancer. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(4):465-70. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3198-3. [PubMed: 25680877].
  • 12. Shaw PV, Crouail P, Paynter R, Coeck M. Education and training in radiation protection: improving alara culture. J Radiol Prot. 2015;35(1):223-7. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/1/223. [PubMed: 25893232].
  • 13. Oestreich AE. RSNA centennial article: ALARA 1912: "As low a dose as possible" a century ago. Radiographics. 2014;34(5):1457-60. doi: 10.1148/rg.345130136. [PubMed: 25208291].
  • 14. Schindera ST, Nauer C, Treier R, Trueb P, von Allmen G, Vock P, et al. [Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose]. Radiology. 2010;50(12):1120. 1122-7. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-2053-2. [PubMed: 20844858].
  • 15. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47(1):27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006. [PubMed: 19195532].
  • 16. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Pien H, Singh S, et al. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(1):40-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181b26c67. [PubMed: 20118720].
  • 17. Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, Bochud FO, Verdun FR. Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. Phys Med. 2013;29(1):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.12.004. [PubMed: 22217444].
  • 18. Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Miyoshi T, Goshima S, Noda Y, Tanahashi Y, et al. Whole-body CT with high heat-capacity X-ray tube and automated tube current modulation--effect of tube current limitation on contrast enhancement, image quality and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(5):877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.019. [PubMed: 25740700].
  • 19. Shen Y, Sun Z, Xu L, Li Y, Zhang N, Yan Z, et al. High-pitch, low-voltage and low-iodine-concentration CT angiography of aorta: assessment of image quality and radiation dose with iterative reconstruction. PLoS One. 2015;10(2). e0117469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117469. [PubMed: 25643353].
  • 20. Chen GZ, Zhang LJ, Schoepf UJ, Wichmann JL, Milliken CM, Zhou CS, et al. Radiation dose and image quality of 70 kVp cerebral CT angiography with optimized sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: comparison with 120 kVp cerebral CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(5):1453-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3533-y. [PubMed: 25636415].
  • 21. Solomon J, Samei E. Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE. Med Phys. 2014;41(9):91908. doi: 10.1118/1.4893497. [PubMed: 25186395].
  • 22. Nie P, Li H, Duan Y, Wang X, Ji X, Cheng Z, et al. Impact of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) algorithm on image quality with 70 kVp-tube-voltage dual-source CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease. PLoS One. 2014;9(3). e91123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091123. [PubMed: 24614683].
  • 23. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):191-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2953. [PubMed: 20028923].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments