Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique on Graft Signal Intensity at Mid-Term Follow-Up

Ziga Snoj 1 , * , Oskar Zupanc 2 and Vladka Salapura 1
Authors Information
1 Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery of the Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 2018, 15 (1); e14060
  • Published Online: January 13, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 25, 2017
  • Revised: October 24, 2017
  • Accepted: November 4, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14060

To Cite: Snoj Z, Zupanc O, Salapura V. The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique on Graft Signal Intensity at Mid-Term Follow-Up, Iran J Radiol. 2018 ; 15(1):e14060. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14060.

Copyright © 2018, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Rak KM, Gillogly SD, Schaefer RA, Yakes WF, Liljedahl RR. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;178(2):553-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987623. [PubMed: 1987623].
  • 2. Biercevicz AM, Akelman MR, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, Shalvoy RM, Badger GJ, et al. MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):693-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546514561435. [PubMed: 25540298].
  • 3. Murakami Y, Sumen Y, Ochi M, Fujimoto E, Deie M, Ikuta Y. Appearance of anterior cruciate ligament autografts in their tibial bone tunnels on oblique axial MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17(5):679-87. [PubMed: 10372521].
  • 4. Saupe N, White LM, Chiavaras MM, Essue J, Weller I, Kunz M, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts: MR imaging features at long-term follow-up--correlation with functional and clinical evaluation. Radiology. 2008;249(2):581-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2492071651. [PubMed: 18769016].
  • 5. Howell SM, Knox KE, Farley TE, Taylor MA. Revascularization of a human anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first two years of implantation. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(1):42-9. doi: 10.1177/036354659502300107. [PubMed: 7726349].
  • 6. Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(2):290-300. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20850. [PubMed: 17260400].
  • 7. Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tallroth K. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(5):290-5. doi: 10.1007/s001670050166. [PubMed: 10525698].
  • 8. Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(4):698-705. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00339. [PubMed: 16595458].
  • 9. Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, et al. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74(6):594-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.01.036. [PubMed: 17888709].
  • 10. Papakonstantinou O, Chung CB, Chanchairujira K, Resnick DL. Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(5):1106-17. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1622-9. [PubMed: 12695835].
  • 11. Snoj Z, Zupanc O, Strazar K, Salapura V. A descriptive study of potential effect of anterior tibial translation, femoral tunnel and anterior cruciate ligament graft inclination on clinical outcome and degenerative changes. Int Orthop. 2017;41(4):789-96. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3386-x. [PubMed: 28064350].
  • 12. Mayr R, Rosenberger R, Agraharam D, Smekal V, El Attal R. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an update. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(9):1299-313. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1552-1. [PubMed: 22669543].
  • 13. Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ, Dhawan A. Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(7):882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.028. [PubMed: 24951356].
  • 14. Buchner M, Schmeer T, Schmitt H. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus tendon - minimum 6 year clinical and radiological follow-up. Knee. 2007;14(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.04.006. [PubMed: 17512735].
  • 15. Hantes ME, Zachos VC, Liantsis A, Venouziou A, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN. Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(8):880-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0738-8. [PubMed: 19238359].
  • 16. Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):113-5. [PubMed: 18188873].
  • 17. Horton LK, Jacobson JA, Lin J, Hayes CW. MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(4):1091-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1751091. [PubMed: 11000171].
  • 18. Casagranda BU, Maxwell NJ, Kavanagh EC, Towers JD, Shen W, Fu FH. Normal appearance and complications of double-bundle and selective-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using optimal MRI techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(5):1407-15. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1185. [PubMed: 19380570].
  • 19. Ntoulia A, Papadopoulou F, Zampeli F, Ristanis S, Argyropoulou M, Georgoulis A. Evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament graft during its healing process: a two-year prospective study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(4):541-52. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1534-y. [PubMed: 23229627].
  • 20. Biercevicz AM, Miranda DL, Machan JT, Murray MM, Fleming BC. In Situ, noninvasive, T2*-weighted MRI-derived parameters predict ex vivo structural properties of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or bioenhanced primary repair in a porcine model. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(3):560-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546512472978. [PubMed: 23348076].
  • 21. Nakase J, Kitaoka K, Toratani T, Kosaka M, Ohashi Y, Tsuchiya H. Grafted tendon healing in femoral and tibial tunnels after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014;22(1):65-9. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200117. [PubMed: 24781617].
  • 22. Farshad-Amacker NA, Potter HG. MRI of knee ligament injury and reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(4):757-73. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24311. [PubMed: 24129921].
  • 23. Pena E, Calvo B, Martinez MA, Palanca D, Doblare M. Influence of the tunnel angle in ACL reconstructions on the biomechanics of the knee joint. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(5):508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.013. [PubMed: 16472892].
  • 24. Simmons R, Howell SM, Hull ML. Effect of the Angle of the Femoral and Tibial Tunnels in the Coronal Plane and Incremental Excision of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament on Tension of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume. 2003;85(6):1018-29. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200306000-00006.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments