Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association

Nasrin Ahmadinejad 1 , 2 , Maryam Jafari 3 , * , Maryam Rahmani 1 , 2 , Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari 4 and Madjid Shakiba 1
Authors Information
1 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Radiology, Breast Cancer Institute, Imam-Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Breast Disease, Breast Cancer Research Center, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Radiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 2018, 15 (2); e14013
  • Published Online: March 10, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: June 20, 2016
  • Revised: May 24, 2017
  • Accepted: November 21, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14013

To Cite: Ahmadinejad N, Jafari M, Rahmani M, Rezaei-Kalantari K, Shakiba M. Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association, Iran J Radiol. 2018 ; 15(2):e14013. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.14013.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
References
  • 1. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Hermann G, de Csepel J, Estabrook A, et al. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics. Ann Surg. 2002;235(2):246-51. [PubMed: 11807365].
  • 2. de Roos MA, van der Vegt B, de Vries J, Wesseling J, de Bock GH. Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(7):2097-104. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9395-7. [PubMed: 17453296].
  • 3. Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, Kimijima I, Okumoto T, Seiji K, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics. 2010;30(5):1183-98. doi: 10.1148/rg.305095073. [PubMed: 20833844].
  • 4. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
  • 5. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013.
  • 6. Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(5):1261-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911192. [PubMed: 8911192].
  • 7. Meyer JE, Kopans DB, Stomper PC, Lindfors KK. Occult breast abnormalities: percutaneous preoperative needle localization. Radiology. 1984;150(2):335-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691085. [PubMed: 6691085].
  • 8. Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ, Fine JP, Salkowski LR, Rubin DL, et al. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology. 2007;242(2):388-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2422052130. [PubMed: 17255409].
  • 9. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(1):35-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648759. [PubMed: 9648759].
  • 10. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications. Breast Cancer. 2008;15(4):291-7. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0033-4. [PubMed: 18288569].
  • 11. Mayr NA, Staples JJ, Hussey DH, Robinson RA, Vanmetre JE. Morphometric studies in intraductal breast carcinoma using computerized image analysis. Cancer. 1991;67(11):2805-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910601)67:11<2805::aid-cncr2820671116>3.0.co;2-d.
  • 12. Bent CK, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Sayre JW. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(5):1378-83. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3423. [PubMed: 20410428].
  • 13. Egan RL, McSweeney MB, Sewell CW. Intramammary calcifications without an associated mass in benign and malignant diseases. Radiology. 1980;137(1 Pt 1):1-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.1.7422830. [PubMed: 7422830].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments