Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality with Various Computed-Tomography Scout Views: The Angular Modulation Technique Based on Information Calculated from Scout Views

Myeong Seong Kim 1 , 2 , Jong-Woong Lee 3 , Sun Geun Kim 4 and Dae Cheol Kweon 5 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, The Korean National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
2 Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3 Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang-Dong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4 Department of Radiological Technology, Baekseok Culture University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
5 Department of Radiological Science, Shinhan University, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 2017, 14 (1); e13477
  • Published Online: September 7, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 19, 2015
  • Revised: August 12, 2016
  • Accepted: August 19, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.35606

To Cite: Seong Kim M, Lee J, Geun Kim S, Cheol Kweon D. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality with Various Computed-Tomography Scout Views: The Angular Modulation Technique Based on Information Calculated from Scout Views, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(1):e13477. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.35606.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22): 2277-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Lee TY, Chhem RK. Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 76(1): 28-35[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009; 47(1): 27-40[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(22): 2078-86[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JJ. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006; 26(2): 503-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Lewis MA, Edyvean S. Patient dose reduction in CT. Br J Radiol. 2005; 78(934): 880-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Kalra MK, Rizzo SM, Novelline RA. Reducing radiation dose in emergency computed tomography with automatic exposure control techniques. Emerg Radiol. 2005; 11(5): 267-74[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004; 230(3): 619-28[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, Ye SJ, Park CM, Chun EJ, et al. Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics. 2008; 28(5): 1451-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH. Radiation dose reduction at CT enterography: How low can we go while preserving diagnostic accuracy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(1): 76-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. Med Phys. 2008; 35(10): 4567-76[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. ICRP Publication 87: Managing patient dose in computed tomography. 2010;
  • 13. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C. Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys. 1999; 26(11): 2248-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Althen JN. Automatic tube-current modulation in CT--a comparison between different solutions. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005; 114(1-3): 308-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Samelson EJ, Christiansen BA, Demissie S, Broe KE, Zhou Y, Meng CA, et al. Reliability of vertebral fracture assessment using multidetector CT lateral scout views: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22(4): 1123-31[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL, Fleischner S. Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2003; 228(1): 15-21[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments