Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Effects of Hypoplastic Fetal Umbilical Artery on Doppler Findings For Common Iliac Arteries

Asli Tanrivermis Sayit 1 , * , Ali Ipek 2 , Ilkay Sedakat Idilman 2 , Nurdan Cay 2 , Pinar Gunbey 3 and Mustafa Karaoglanoglu 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Samsun Gazi State Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
2 Department of Radiology, Ankara Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
3 Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 2017, 14 (1); e13459
  • Published Online: August 7, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 13, 2014
  • Revised: February 17, 2015
  • Accepted: April 2, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.23540

To Cite: Tanrivermis Sayit A, Ipek A, Sedakat Idilman I, Cay N, Gunbey P, et al. Effects of Hypoplastic Fetal Umbilical Artery on Doppler Findings For Common Iliac Arteries, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(1):e13459. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.23540.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Weissman A, Drugan A. Sonographic findings of the umbilical cord: implications for the risk of fetal chromosomal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 17(6): 536-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Predanic M, Perni SC. Antenatal assessment of discordant umbilical arteries in singleton pregnancies. Croat Med J. 2006; 47(5): 701-8[PubMed]
  • 3. Sepulveda W, Flack NJ, Bower S, Fisk NM. The value of color Doppler ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of hypoplastic umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 4(2): 143-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Petrikovsky B, Schneider E. Prenatal diagnosis and clinical significance of hypoplastic umbilical artery. Prenat Diagn. 1996; 16(10): 938-40[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Sepulveda W, Shennan AH, Bower S, Fisk NM. Discordant umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in spontaneous umbilical cord hematoma. J Clin Ultrasound. 1995; 23(5): 330-2[PubMed]
  • 6. Harper MA, Murnaghan GA. Discordant umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989; 96(12): 1449-50[PubMed]
  • 7. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Saile G, Bruhwiler H. The clinical significance of antenatal detection of discordant umbilical arteries. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91(1): 86-91[PubMed]
  • 8. Sepulveda W, Nicolaidis P, Bower S, Ridout DA, Fisk NM. Common iliac artery flow velocity waveforms in fetuses with a single umbilical artery: a longitudinal study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103(7): 660-3[PubMed]
  • 9. Dolkart LA, Reimers FT, Kuonen CA. Discordant umbilical arteries: ultrasonographic and Doppler analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79(1): 59-63[PubMed]
  • 10. Meyer WW, Lind J. Iliac arteries in children with a single umbilical artery. Structure, calcifications, and early atherosclerotic lesions. Arch Dis Child. 1974; 49(9): 671-9[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments