Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Malfunction of Totally Implantable Central Venous Ports

Hyo-Cheol Kim 1 , * , Saebeom Hur 1 and Hoyong Jeon 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 2017, 14 (1); e13455
  • Published Online: August 6, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 15, 2014
  • Revised: November 8, 2014
  • Accepted: January 9, 2015
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.22046

To Cite: Kim H, Hur S, Jeon H. Malfunction of Totally Implantable Central Venous Ports, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(1):e13455. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.22046.

Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Dede D, Akmangit I, Yildirim ZN, Sanverdi E, Sayin B. Ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided insertion of chest ports. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008; 34(12): 1340-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Di Carlo I, Pulvirenti E, Mannino M, Toro A. Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17(6): 1649-56[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Sakamoto N, Arai Y, Takeuchi Y, Takahashi M, Tsurusaki M, Sugimuta K. Ultrasound-Guided Radiological Placement of Central Venous Port via the Subclavian Vein: A Retrospective Analysis of 500 Cases at a Single Institute. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010; 33(5): 989-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Teichgraber UK, Kausche S, Nagel SN, Gebauer B. Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(6): 1224-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Ahn SJ, Kim HC, Chung JW, An SB, Yin YH, Jae HJ, et al. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center. Korean J Radiol. 2012; 13(3): 314-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Goltz JP, Janssen H, Petritsch B, Kickuth R. Femoral placement of totally implantable venous power ports as an alternative implantation site for patients with central vein occlusions. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22(2): 383-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Moureau N, Poole S, Murdock MA, Gray SM, Semba CP. Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002; 13(10): 1009-16[PubMed]
  • 8. Goossens GA, Stas M, Jerome M, Moons P. Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2011; 19(7): 883-98[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Bassi KK, Giri AK, Pattanayak M, Abraham SW, Pandey KK. Totally implantable venous access ports: retrospective review of long-term complications in 81 patients. Indian J Cancer. 2012; 49(1): 114-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Goltz JP, Petritsch B, Thurner A, Hahn D, Kickuth R. Complications after percutaneous placement of totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm. Clin Radiol. 2012; 67(11): 1101-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Toure A, Vanhems P, Lombard-Bohas C, Cassier P, Pere-Verge D, Souquet JC, et al. Totally implantable central venous access port infections in patients with digestive cancer: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40(10): 935-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Subramaniam A, Kim KH, Bryant SA, Kimball KJ, Huh WK, Straughn JM, et al. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 123(1): 54-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Plumhans C, Mahnken AH, Ocklenburg C, Keil S, Behrendt FF, Gunther RW, et al. Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79(3): 338-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access--a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30(2): 454-60[PubMed]
  • 15. Moeinipour AA, Amouzeshi A, Joudi M, Fathi M, Jahanbakhsh S, Hafez S, et al. A rare central venous catheter malposition: a case report. Anesth Pain Med. 2014; 4(1)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Gray RJ, Levitin A, Buck D, Brown LC, Sparling YH, Jablonski KA, et al. Percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping versus transcatheter urokinase infusion for malfunctioning well-positioned tunneled central venous dialysis catheters: a prospective, randomized trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000; 11(9): 1121-9[PubMed]
  • 17. Merport M, Murphy TP, Egglin TK, Dubel GJ. Fibrin sheath stripping versus catheter exchange for the treatment of failed tunneled hemodialysis catheters: randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000; 11(9): 1115-20[PubMed]
  • 18. Heye S, Maleux G, Goossens GA, Vaninbroukx J, Jerome M, Stas M. Feasibility and safety of endovascular stripping of totally implantable venous access devices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 35(3): 607-12[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments