Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Value of Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction for Evaluating Coronary Calcified Plaques

Xianchun Zeng 1 , 2 , Shaolei Kang 2 , Rongpin Wang 1 , Dan Han 2 , * , Yong Wang 2 and Shiping Yang 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang, China
2 Department of CT, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 2017, 14 (1); e13453
  • Published Online: March 5, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 3, 2014
  • Revised: March 8, 2014
  • Accepted: June 22, 2014
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.18000

To Cite: Zeng X, Kang S, Wang R, Han D, Wang Y, et al. Value of Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction for Evaluating Coronary Calcified Plaques, Iran J Radiol. 2017 ; 14(1):e13453. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.18000.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. La Grutta L, Runza G, Galia M, Maffei E, Lo Re G, Grassedonio E, et al. Atherosclerotic pattern of coronary myocardial bridging assessed with CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 28(2): 405-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Dharampal AS, Rossi A, de Feyter PJ. Computed tomography-coronary angiography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011; 12(8): 554-61[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Stolzmann P, Plass A, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(6): 766-76[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Tatsugami F, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol. 2009; 16(1): 15-21[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Paul JF. Individually adapted coronary 64-slice CT angiography based on precontrast attenuation values, using different kVp and tube current settings: evaluation of image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 27 Suppl 1: 53-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Ripsweden J, Brismar TB, Holm J, Melinder A, Mir-Akbari H, Nilsson T, et al. Impact on image quality and radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography: 100 kVp versus 120 kVp. Acta Radiol. 2010; 51(8): 903-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(11): 1113-23[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Slovis TL. CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179(1): 39-41[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, Roobottom C, Rowles N, Bellenger N, et al. A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart. 2010; 96(12): 922-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Do S, et al. Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology. 2010; 256(1): 261-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, Renker M, Zwerner PL, O'Brien TX, et al. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(10): 2130-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Han BK, Grant KL, Garberich R, Sedlmair M, Lindberg J, Lesser JR. Assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012; 6(3): 200-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Ebersberger U, Tricarico F, Schoepf UJ, Blanke P, Spears JR, Rowe GW, et al. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(1): 125-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, Reddy RP, Zhang C, Yu W, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(11): 3141-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Karaca M, Kirilmaz A, Oncel G, Oncel D, Yilmaz H, Tamci B, et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-slice computed tomography in detection and evaluation of anomalous coronary arteries. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007; 213(3): 249-59[PubMed]
  • 16. Fei X, Du X, Li P, Liao J, Shen Y, Li K. Effect of dose-reduced scan protocols on cardiac coronary image quality with 64-row MDCT: a cardiac phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 67(1): 85-91[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, Pflederer T, Anders K, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4(4): 328-37[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Gagarina NV, Irwan R, Gordina G, Fominykh E, Sijens PE. Image quality in reduced-dose coronary CT angiography. Acad Radiol. 2011; 18(8): 984-90[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Goetti R, Leschka S, Boschung M, Mayer S, Wyss C, Stolzmann P, et al. Radiation doses from phantom measurements at high-pitch dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(4): 773-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Goetti R, et al. Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(12): 2521-6[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments