Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar
Corrected Proof scheduled for 16 (1)

Investigating the Effect of mA Variation on Absorbed Dose to Salivary Glands and Mandible Body in CBCT

Zahra Alirezaei 1 , * , Keyvan Jabbari 1 , Tohid Dehghani 1 , Mohammadbagher Tavakoli 1 , Mojdeh Mehdizadeh 2 , Nafiseh Berenjkoob 1 and Reihane Faraji 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Physics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: In Press (In Press); e13383
  • Published Online: September 18, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 15, 2017
  • Revised: August 11, 2018
  • Accepted: August 18, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13383

To Cite: Alirezaei Z, Jabbari K, Dehghani T, Tavakoli M, Mehdizadeh M, et al. Investigating the Effect of mA Variation on Absorbed Dose to Salivary Glands and Mandible Body in CBCT, Iran J Radiol. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e13383. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13383.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75-80. [PubMed: 16480609].
  • 2. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-64. [PubMed: 9866761].
  • 3. Yamamoto K, Ueno K, Seo K, Shinohara D. Development of dento-maxillofacial cone beam X-ray computed tomography system. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6 Suppl 1:160-2. [PubMed: 14606550].
  • 4. Elefteriadis JN, Athanasiou AE. Evaluation of impacted canines by means of computerized tomography. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996;11(3):257-64. [PubMed: 9456629].
  • 5. Kwong JC, Palomo JM, Landers MA, Figueroa A, Hans MG. Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(2):317-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.053. [PubMed: 18249300].
  • 6. Schulze D, Heiland M, Schmelzle R, Rother UJ. Diagnostic possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography in the facial skeleton. Int Congr Ser. 2004;1268:1179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.03.286.
  • 7. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(2):83-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/28403350. [PubMed: 15313998].
  • 8. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(1):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018. [PubMed: 18504152].
  • 9. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028. [PubMed: 21196094].
  • 10. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(5):640 e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.019. [PubMed: 18456133].
  • 11. Pauwels R, Silkosessak O, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H, Panmekiate S. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: Balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(5):20140059. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140059. [PubMed: 24708447]. [PubMed Central: PMC4082271].
  • 12. Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(6):773-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.019. [PubMed: 18424119].
  • 13. Farman AG. ALARA still applies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100(4):395-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.055. [PubMed: 16182157].
  • 14. Martin CJ, Sutton DG, Sharp PF. Balancing patient dose and image quality. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50(1):1-19. [PubMed: 10028625].
  • 15. Brenner DJ. Effective dose: A flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(967):521-3. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22942198. [PubMed: 18443016].
  • 16. Martin CJ. Effective dose: How should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol. 2007;80(956):639-47. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25922439. [PubMed: 17646189].
  • 17. Valentin J. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. [PubMed: 18082557].
  • 18. Thilander-Klang A, Helmrot E. Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;139(1-3):306-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq081. [PubMed: 20211918].
  • 19. Huda W, Sandison GA. Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. Health Phys. 1984;47(3):463-7. [PubMed: 6500950].
  • 20. Winslow JF, Hyer DE, Fisher RF, Tien CJ, Hintenlang DE. Construction of anthropomorphic phantoms for use in dosimetry studies. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(3):2986. [PubMed: 19692982]. [PubMed Central: PMC5720556].
  • 21. Alirezaei Z, Jabbari K, Tavakkoli MB, Dehghani T, Mahdavi H. [Design and construction of anthropomorphic phantom, using a CT-Scan of a particular patient for CT-Scan dosimetry studies]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2015;33(323):125-33. Persian.
  • 22. Berenjkoub N, Tavakoli MB, Jabbari K, Monadi S, Rahnama HR. [Investigation of dose distributions of computed tomography with cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2015;32(309):1918-32. Persian.
  • 23. Khajooei-Fard R, Tavakoli MB, Mahdizadeh M, Hasanzadeh A. [Comparison of the absorbed doses of eyes, thyroid and parotid glands in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic examinations using cranex® 3D]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2016;34:1151-9. Persian.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments