Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Investigating the Effect of mA Variation on Absorbed Dose to Salivary Glands and Mandible Body in CBCT

Zahra Alirezaei 1 , * , Keyvan Jabbari 1 , Tohid Dehghani 1 , Mohammadbagher Tavakoli 1 , Mojdeh Mehdizadeh 2 , Nafiseh Berenjkoob 1 and Reihane Faraji 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Medical Physics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: January 31, 2019, 16 (1); e13383
  • Published Online: September 18, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 15, 2017
  • Revised: August 11, 2018
  • Accepted: August 18, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13383

To Cite: Alirezaei Z, Jabbari K, Dehghani T, Tavakoli M, Mehdizadeh M, et al. Investigating the Effect of mA Variation on Absorbed Dose to Salivary Glands and Mandible Body in CBCT, Iran J Radiol. 2019 ; 16(1):e13383. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13383.

Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75-80. [PubMed: 16480609].
  • 2. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-64. [PubMed: 9866761].
  • 3. Yamamoto K, Ueno K, Seo K, Shinohara D. Development of dento-maxillofacial cone beam X-ray computed tomography system. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6 Suppl 1:160-2. [PubMed: 14606550].
  • 4. Elefteriadis JN, Athanasiou AE. Evaluation of impacted canines by means of computerized tomography. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996;11(3):257-64. [PubMed: 9456629].
  • 5. Kwong JC, Palomo JM, Landers MA, Figueroa A, Hans MG. Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(2):317-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.053. [PubMed: 18249300].
  • 6. Schulze D, Heiland M, Schmelzle R, Rother UJ. Diagnostic possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography in the facial skeleton. Int Congr Ser. 2004;1268:1179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.03.286.
  • 7. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(2):83-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/28403350. [PubMed: 15313998].
  • 8. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(1):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018. [PubMed: 18504152].
  • 9. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028. [PubMed: 21196094].
  • 10. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(5):640 e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.019. [PubMed: 18456133].
  • 11. Pauwels R, Silkosessak O, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H, Panmekiate S. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: Balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(5):20140059. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140059. [PubMed: 24708447]. [PubMed Central: PMC4082271].
  • 12. Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(6):773-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.019. [PubMed: 18424119].
  • 13. Farman AG. ALARA still applies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100(4):395-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.055. [PubMed: 16182157].
  • 14. Martin CJ, Sutton DG, Sharp PF. Balancing patient dose and image quality. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50(1):1-19. [PubMed: 10028625].
  • 15. Brenner DJ. Effective dose: A flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(967):521-3. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22942198. [PubMed: 18443016].
  • 16. Martin CJ. Effective dose: How should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol. 2007;80(956):639-47. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25922439. [PubMed: 17646189].
  • 17. Valentin J. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. [PubMed: 18082557].
  • 18. Thilander-Klang A, Helmrot E. Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;139(1-3):306-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq081. [PubMed: 20211918].
  • 19. Huda W, Sandison GA. Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. Health Phys. 1984;47(3):463-7. [PubMed: 6500950].
  • 20. Winslow JF, Hyer DE, Fisher RF, Tien CJ, Hintenlang DE. Construction of anthropomorphic phantoms for use in dosimetry studies. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(3):2986. [PubMed: 19692982]. [PubMed Central: PMC5720556].
  • 21. Alirezaei Z, Jabbari K, Tavakkoli MB, Dehghani T, Mahdavi H. [Design and construction of anthropomorphic phantom, using a CT-Scan of a particular patient for CT-Scan dosimetry studies]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2015;33(323):125-33. Persian.
  • 22. Berenjkoub N, Tavakoli MB, Jabbari K, Monadi S, Rahnama HR. [Investigation of dose distributions of computed tomography with cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2015;32(309):1918-32. Persian.
  • 23. Khajooei-Fard R, Tavakoli MB, Mahdizadeh M, Hasanzadeh A. [Comparison of the absorbed doses of eyes, thyroid and parotid glands in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic examinations using cranex® 3D]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2016;34:1151-9. Persian.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments