Iranian Journal of Radiology

Published by: Kowsar

Diameters and Flow Characteristics of Forearm Arteries in the Preoperative Period Using Doppler Ultrasonography in Healthy Individuals

Hatice Kaplanoglu 1 , * and Engin Dinc 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Radiology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Radiology: April 2018, 15 (2); e12904
  • Published Online: February 26, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 19, 2017
  • Revised: October 23, 2017
  • Accepted: January 2, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.12904

To Cite: Kaplanoglu H, Dinc E. Diameters and Flow Characteristics of Forearm Arteries in the Preoperative Period Using Doppler Ultrasonography in Healthy Individuals, Iran J Radiol. 2018 ; 15(2):e12904. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.12904.

Copyright © 2018, Iranian Journal of Radiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Hahalis G, Tsigkas G, Xanthopoulou I, Deftereos S, Ziakas A, Raisakis K, et al. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):252-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000150. [PubMed: 23735472].
  • 2. Geng W, Fu X, Gu X, Jiang Y, Fan W, Wang Y, et al. Safety and feasibility of transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(7):1222-8. [PubMed: 24709170].
  • 3. Valgimigli M, Saia F, Guastaroba P, Menozzi A, Magnavacchi P, Santarelli A, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-adjusted and -matched analysis from the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna) multicenter registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(1):23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.018. [PubMed: 22230147].
  • 4. Kwan TW, Ratcliffe JA, Chaudhry M, Huang Y, Wong S, Zhou X, et al. Transulnar catheterization in patients with ipsilateral radial artery occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(7):849-55. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24662. [PubMed: 23008162].
  • 5. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013;8(11):1242-51. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I11A192. [PubMed: 23354100].
  • 6. Aykan AC, Hatem E, Kalaycioglu E, Altintas Aykan D, Gokdeniz T, Arslan AO, et al. Prediction of radial artery diameter in candidates for transradial coronary angiography: Is occupation a factor? Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2015;43(5):450-6. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2015.75002. [PubMed: 26148077].
  • 7. Brzezinski M, Luisetti T, London MJ. Radial artery cannulation: a comprehensive review of recent anatomic and physiologic investigations. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1763-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbd416. [PubMed: 19923502].
  • 8. Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Crit Care. 2002;6(3):199-204. [PubMed: 12133178].
  • 9. Rao SV, Bernat I, Bertrand OF. Clinical update: Remaining challenges and opportunities for improvement in percutaneous transradial coronary procedures. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2521-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs169. [PubMed: 22815330].
  • 10. Agrifoglio M, Dainese L, Pasotti S, Galanti A, Cannata A, Roberto M, et al. Preoperative assessment of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: is the clinical Allen test adequate? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(2):570-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.034. [PubMed: 15680837].
  • 11. Yadava OP, Dinda AK, Mohanty BK, Mishra R, Ahlawat V, Kundu A. Is radial artery Doppler scanning mandatory for use as coronary bypass conduit? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015;23(7):822-7. doi: 10.1177/0218492315589197. [PubMed: 26071450].
  • 12. Gokhroo R, Bisht D, Padmanabhan D, Gupta S, Kishor K, Ranwa B. Feasibility of ulnar artery for cardiac catheterization: AJmer ULnar ARtery (AJULAR) catheterization study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(1):42-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25806. [PubMed: 25559217].
  • 13. Loh YJ, Nakao M, Tan WD, Lim CH, Tan YS, Chua YL. Factors influencing radial artery size. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2007;15(4):324-6. doi: 10.1177/021849230701500412. [PubMed: 17664207].
  • 14. Pancholy SB, Heck LA, Patel T. Forearm arterial anatomy and flow characteristics: a prospective observational study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27(4):218-21. [PubMed: 25840406].
  • 15. Velasco A, Ono C, Nugent K, Tarwater P, Kumar A. Ultrasonic evaluation of the radial artery diameter in a local population from Texas. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(7):339-41. [PubMed: 22781473].
  • 16. Kotowycz MA, Dzavik V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(1):127-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965871. [PubMed: 22338002].
  • 17. Kotowycz MA, Johnston KW, Ivanov J, Asif N, Almoghairi AM, Choudhury A, et al. Predictors of radial artery size in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: insights from the Good Radial Artery Size Prediction (GRASP) study. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(2):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.11.021. [PubMed: 24461923].
  • 18. Kohonen M, Teerenhovi O, Terho T, Laurikka J, Tarkka M. Is the Allen test reliable enough? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(6):902-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.08.017. [PubMed: 17889550].
  • 19. Bazemore E, Mann JT. Problems and complications of the transradial approach for coronary interventions: a review. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17(3):156-9. [PubMed: 15867445].
  • 20. Vassilev D, Smilkova D, Gil R. Ulnar artery as access site for cardiac catheterization: anatomical considerations. J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21(1):56-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00314.x. [PubMed: 18086137].
  • 21. Rashid M, Kwok CS, Pancholy S, Chugh S, Kedev SA, Bernat I, et al. Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(1). doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002686. [PubMed: 26811162].
  • 22. Wagener JF, Rao SV. Radial artery occlusion after transradial approach to cardiac catheterization. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015;17(3):489. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0489-6. [PubMed: 25651786].
  • 23. Gaudino M, Anselmi A, Serricchio M, Flore R, Santoliquido A, Gerardino L, et al. Late haemodynamic and functional consequences of radial artery removal on the forearm circulation. Int J Cardiol. 2008;129(2):255-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.07.096. [PubMed: 17988752].
  • 24. Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: results in 3,977 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(5):1557-61. [PubMed: 11722043].
  • 25. Ronald A, Patel A, Dunning J. Is the Allen's test adequate to safely confirm that a radial artery may be harvested for coronary arterial bypass grafting? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4(4):332-40. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.110247. [PubMed: 17670425].
  • 26. Abu-Omar Y, Mussa S, Anastasiadis K, Steel S, Hands L, Taggart DP. Duplex ultrasonography predicts safety of radial artery harvest in the presence of an abnormal Allen test. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(1):116-9. [PubMed: 14726046].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments