IF: 0.478
Cite Score:
0.54
THOMSON REUTERS - SCOPUS

Correlations of T2* Mapping with Delayed Gadolinium Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Chronic Myocardial Infarction

AUTHORS

Ali Mohammadzadeh 1 , Zahra Maleki 1 , Ali Nahardani 1 , Maryam Mohammadzadeh 2 , 3 , *

1 Department of Radiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular and Medical Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Radiology, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

How to Cite: Mohammadzadeh A, Maleki Z, Nahardani A, Mohammadzadeh M. Correlations of T2* Mapping with Delayed Gadolinium Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Chronic Myocardial Infarction, Iran J Radiol. 2018 ; 15(4):e12688. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.12688.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Iranian Journal of Radiology: 15 (4); e12688
Published Online: August 14, 2018
Article Type: Research Article
Received: May 24, 2017
Revised: June 3, 2018
Accepted: June 10, 2018
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Scar tissue formation is a common phenomenon in myocardial infarctions. Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the modality of choice to evaluate the location and size of the scar tissue. Nevertheless, in patients with severe kidney impairment, administration of gadolinium is contraindicated.

Objectives: So the aim of this study was to substitute a safe way for myocardial infarction assessments in patients with a history of renal function impairment. We assessed the T2* quantitative value changes in myocardial infarction-related scar tissue and compared them with normal/remote myocardial tissue T2* values to evaluate its application in non-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging viability assessments.

Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with a previous history of non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination with a 1.5T MR imaging scanner (Avanto, Siemens AG Healthcare Sector, Erlangen, Germany). The time interval between myocardial infarction occurrence and CMR assessment was at least six months. All the patients had normal kidney function. The imaging protocol consisted of three steps: the functional left-ventricular imaging; 8-echoes gradient recalled echo T2* mapping; and delayed/late gadolinium-enhancement imaging. The left-ventricle functional and T2* mapping assessments were done by CMR42 image analysis software (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, Canada). T2* values were calculated for 49 regions of interests (ROIs) at the infarction (14 ROIs), peri-infarction (12 ROIs), and remote/normal myocardial tissues (23 ROIs), and their means were compared statistically by the Leven’s test. Finally, the receiver operator characteristics curve was calculated.

Results: T2* (mean ± SD) values of the normal/remote, peri-infarction, and infarcted myocardial tissues were calculated as 29.42 ± 4.50, 30.71 ± 4.86, and 35.46 ± 3.61, respectively. There was a significant alteration in the post-infarction scar tissue’s myocardial T2* values by comparison with the normal/remote myocardium (P < 0.001). No significant differences were noticed between the normal/remote and peri-infarction regions’ T2* relaxation times (P > 0.05). Area under the curve was 81% for patients evaluated for scars. Cutoff value of 31.70 yielded 92% sensitivity and 72% specificity.

Conclusion: T2* relaxation time can provide useful and sensitive information on scar tissue formation location, and can offer a greater sensitivity into the non-contrast CMR imaging viability assessments besides other relaxation phenomena, especially the longitudinal relaxation time.

Keywords

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2* Mapping Delayed Gadolinium-Enhancement Imaging Myocardial Infarction

Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Myocardial ischemia is defined as the insufficiency of blood supply which results in inadequate oxygenation to the myocardial tissue (1). Whenever there is a reduction in myocardial blood flow, myocardial tissue adapts itself to the newly introduced oxygenation level (2). When blood flow reduces beyond tolerance of the myocardial tissue, necrosis takes place, a condition that is called myocardial infarction (MI) (1, 3). In this manner, myocardial functionality is reduced (4). The ischemic myocardium can be divided into two categories: the stunned myocardium; and the hibernating myocardium (5). Stunned myocardium is the predominant consequence of acute myocardial ischemia with myocardial dysfunction but responds positively to reperfusion in short term. On the other hand, hibernating myocardium, which primarily occurs because of long-term hypo-perfusion, or multiple acute ischemia of the myocardial tissue may respond either positively or negatively to revascularization (6). While underlying mechanisms of stunning and hibernating myocardial regulatory processes are not completely understood, it is hypothesized that both conditions benefit from downregulation of myocyte metabolism (7). There is a strong correlation between increasing hypoxia stress duration on the myocardium and its damage reversibility. Therefore, diagnosis of viable myocardium is crucial in treatment planning of patients experiencing chronic MI (6).

There are different modalities to evaluate the viability status of the myocardium. To date, stress-radionuclide imaging, stress-echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging techniques have been introduced as the main approaches for such evaluations (8, 9). Stress-radionuclide imaging employs the emission of gamma ionizing radiation radiopharmaceuticals in its setting, thus it has hazardous effects on biological tissues (10, 11). Stress-radionuclide imaging cannot acquire the data of the myocardial functionality and can only evaluate myocardial viability by its perfusion patterns and late enhancements. Stress-radionuclide scan also cannot evaluate the subendocardial infarction and yields a low sensitivity in those regions (11, 12). Recent advances have led to the emergence of positron emission tomography (PET). The fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET has a higher sensitivity and specificity in myocardial viability assessments by comparison with Thallium 201 SPECT imaging. In addition, PET benefits from a variety of radiotracers, such as Rb-82, N-13 ammonia, and O-15 H2O. Studies have demonstrated that myocardial perfusion assessments by these radiotracers would result in a higher diagnostic accuracy in coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluations in comparison to other radionuclide imaging modalities and methods. This issue has great importance in the balanced reduction of myocardial perfusion due to three-vessel or main-stem CAD (13). Stress-echocardiography can evaluate the myocardial viability status just by functional analysis but is unable to assess the structural and histological changes on its own (14, 15). Contrary to this, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can evaluate myocardial perfusion, histological changes, and functionality. Thus, it is the modality of choice for viability assessments (6, 16).

In CMR imaging viability assessments, there is a need for gadolinium-based contrast material injection to evaluate the myocardial rest-perfusion, early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in order to rule out the hypo-perfusion, no-reflow zone, and scar tissue formation (16). Unfortunately, in patients with renal failure and hypersensitivity to gadolinium-based contrast agents, the injection of gadolinium is contraindicated and there is a need for introduction of a magnetic resonance criterion to make it possible to evaluate myocardial viability status (17). Previous studies have proved the development of an inflammatory process after acute MI, while there would be tissue alteration and scar formation in chronic ones (18, 19). As such, the synced inflammation in acute MI and tissue alteration in chronic MI would result in different magnetic properties and thus in different T1/T2/T2* relaxation times (20). In recent years, numerous studies have evaluated the role of cardiac T1 and T2 mapping in MI or viability assessments. Studies have showed a high sensitivity of T2 mapping techniques in edema formation in acute MI, and T1 mapping techniques in fibrosis evaluations. In these conditions, both the native T1 and T2 relaxation times are prolonged (21). Although myocardial T1 and T2 mapping techniques are becoming increasingly popular worldwide, there should be more investigations in this field. T2* mapping is also a popular method for post-revascularization hemorrhage imaging. By this method, clinicians can determine the extent of ischemic area at risk. This technique is usually performed post reperfusion procedures. These studies have hypothesized that the post-reperfusion hemorrhage extent might be a good representative of the microvascular obstruction (MVO). MVO is considered as non-viable myocardial volume in CMR assessments (22). In fact, post revascularization T2* mapping would reveal MVO and micro-hemorrhage as a post MI adverse effect. In this study, we hypothesized that the pre-revascularization T2* mapping could be a strong indicator of MI extent. In contrast with previous studies (O Regan et al., Komar et al., and Hamirani et al.), we selected our patients at pre-revascularization stage of MI therapy to search for the possibility of T2* relaxometry potential in myocardial scar tissue detection. Although there are numerous literatures about the native cardiac T1 and T2 values changes in different cardiovascular diseases, few studies have been conducted to evaluate myocardial T2* changes in MI. Therefore, in our research, we decided to evaluate native myocardial T2* value changes in patients with MI and assess the technique for myocardial fibrosis detection in pre-revascularization stages.

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess T2* mapping as an alternative to gadolinium enhanced sequence for delineation of infarcted zone in patients suffering from chronic myocardial infarction who specifically have restrictions for gadolinium injection.

3. Patients and Methods

3.1. Study Population

In this study, 20 patients with confirmed non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) electrocardiographic (ECG) changes (mean age of 60, 13 males and 7 females in the age range of 26 - 79) underwent CMR examinations for viability assessments by 1.5T cardiac MR imaging (Avanto, Siemens AG Healthcare Sector, Erlangen, Germany). The time interval between MI occurrence and CMR assessment was at least six months. The patients’ demographic information is provided in Table 1. All the national and international ethical human research rules were supervised by the institution’s ethical research committee and followed completely by the researchers.

Table 1. Patient Demographic Information
VariablesValue
Gender
Male13
Female7
Age, y
20 - 291
30 - 493
50 - 649
> 657
Hyperlipidemia
Yes9
No11
Smoking
Yes8
No12
Diabetes
Yes12
No8
Hypertension
Yes11
No9
ECG
NSTEMI20
STEMI0
Myocardial infarction
Acute0
Chronic20
Planned for CABG
Yes7
No13

Abbreviations: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; ECG, electrocardiographic; NSTEMI, non ST-elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

3.2. CMR Examination

All CMR examinations were performed using a 1.5T MR system (Avanto, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The protocol was identical for all patients. A 16-channel phased-array body RF coil was employed for signal reception in all patients. All the sequences were ECG-gated either retrospectively or prospectively.

3.2.1. Cine Imaging

True-fast imaging with steady state precession (True-FISP) 2D Breath-hold cine images was obtained retrospectively in the two-chamber, four-chamber, three-chamber, left ventricular output tract, and short-axis views in all the patients to assess the left ventricular wall motion kinesis qualitatively and to measure its indices quantitatively. The sequence parameters are given in Table 2.

Table 2. Sequence Description and Parameters Used in This Study
SequenceGRE- 8 echoesTrue-FISP PSIRTurbo-spin echo
TR/TE, ms200/(2.59,4.82,7.05, 9.28, 11.51, 13.74, 15.97, 18.20)800/1.02281/13
TI, ms-300-
Flip angle2040160
FOV, mm300 × 400255 × 240370
Pixel size, mm2.08 × 2.081.06 × 1.061.6 × 0.8
BW, Hz/Px8151420109
Averages114
ECG-GatingProspective-systoleProspective-diastoleProspective-systole
ApplicationT2* mappingLGE imagingHyperemia

Abbreviations: BW, bandwidth; ECG, electrocardiography; FISP, fast imaging with steady-state precession; FOV, field-of- view; GRE, gradient echo; GRE-8 Echoes, gradient recalled echo with 8 TEs; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; PSIR, phase-sensitive inversion recovery; TE, echo-times; TI, inversion time; TR, repetition-time.

3.2.2. T2* Mapping

The cardiac T2* relaxometry data were acquired by a breath-hold, bright-blood, gradient-recalled echo pulse sequence which could obtain eight signals with different echo-times (TE) in each repetition-time (TR). The patients’ hearts are imaged in the three basal, mid-ventricular and apical short-axis, two-chamber and four-chamber views by the given parameters in Table 2.

3.2.3. LGE Imaging

The LGE images were acquired 10 min after the gadolinium-based contrast agent administration by the True-FISP Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery (True-FISP PSIR) pulse sequence in the two-chamber, four-chamber, and short-axis views. Gadoteric acid under the brand name of Dotarem (Guerbet, France) was administered to all patients. The contrast media injection dose and flow rate were 0.2 mmol/kg and 4 mL/s, respectively. All the LGE images were acquired in swapping phase direction again to eliminate any artifactual false positives from the final analysis (Table 2).

3.2.4. Pre-/Post-Contrast T1W Imaging

Pre-/Post-contrast T1w imaging is always done by the MRI’s working horse pulse sequence, the Turbo-Spin Echo. Its applied parameters are given in Table 2. The imaging plane of choice in the cardiac T1w imaging is transverse and it is always gated during the systolic activity of the heart.

3.3. Image Analysis

The acquired left-ventricular functional images were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively by two, five-year experienced, cardiothoracic radiologists using CMR42 (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, Canada) cardiac MRI analysis software. The T2* relaxation times were quantified by an experienced clinical MRI physicist in the normal remote, peri-infarction myocardium, and LGE regions by the same software. All analysis was done in a single-blind manner. Mean T2* values in the proven LGE, peri- and remote myocardial regions were compared statistically by the SPSS v.22 software (IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) to assess any significant differences between these regions. Finally, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn and Youdin index and area under curve (AUC) were calculated.

4. Results

Out of the 20 sampled patients, 13 patients were diagnosed with no myocardial fibrosis and seven patients with myocardial scars on the LGE images; out of these seven positive patients with delayed gadolinium enhancement (DGE), four patients were diagnosed with the left ascending artery (LAD) territory DGE (Figure 1) and three with the right coronary artery (RCA) territory scar tissue formations (Figure 2). In total, 49 regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the GRE-8echoes images: 14 ROIs on the infarcted myocardium; 23 ROIs on the normal/remote myocardium; and 12 ROIs on peri-infarction myocardial tissues. All the DGE images were correlated with the cine-functional short-axis views to eliminate any artifactual discrimination between the results. The mean ± SD T2* values of the normal/remote myocardium, peri-infarction myocardium, and delayed enhancement region were calculated as 29.42 ± 4.50, 30.71 ± 4.86, and 35.46 ± 3.61 milliseconds, respectively, as is shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Normal/Remote, Peri-Infarction, and Infarcted Myocardial Mean ± SD T2* Values
MyocardiumNo.Mean ± SD
Delayed enhanced myocardium1435.46 ± 3.62
Peri-infarction myocardium1230.72 ± 4.87
Remote/normal myocardium2329.42 ± 4.51

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.

A patient with myocardial infarction. A and B, Depict chronic myocardial infarctions in the left ascending artery (LAD) and partially left circumflex artery (LCX) territories. B and C, As can be noticed, two orange and blue regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the fibrous and normal tissues, respectively. D, The ROIs’ T2* signal decay curves show a significant difference between the scar and remote healthy myocardial T2* relaxation values. The fibrous (orange) and normal remote myocardial (blue) T2*relaxation times equal to 41 and 27.7 ms, respectively.
Figure 1. A patient with myocardial infarction. A and B, Depict chronic myocardial infarctions in the left ascending artery (LAD) and partially left circumflex artery (LCX) territories. B and C, As can be noticed, two orange and blue regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the fibrous and normal tissues, respectively. D, The ROIs’ T2* signal decay curves show a significant difference between the scar and remote healthy myocardial T2* relaxation values. The fibrous (orange) and normal remote myocardial (blue) T2*relaxation times equal to 41 and 27.7 ms, respectively.
A 50-year-old male patient with myocardial infarction. A and B, Depict the myocardial T2* mapping. There are two regions of interest drawn on the infarcted myocardium (orange) and the remote normal area (blue). C and D, Two-chamber and short-axis views, show delayed gadolinium transmural enhancement in the left ascending artery (LAD) and right coronary artery (RCA) territories. E, Depict the different T2* decay curves in the infarcted (orange, 47.73 ms) and remote normal myocardium (blue, 32.03 ms).
Figure 2. A 50-year-old male patient with myocardial infarction. A and B, Depict the myocardial T2* mapping. There are two regions of interest drawn on the infarcted myocardium (orange) and the remote normal area (blue). C and D, Two-chamber and short-axis views, show delayed gadolinium transmural enhancement in the left ascending artery (LAD) and right coronary artery (RCA) territories. E, Depict the different T2* decay curves in the infarcted (orange, 47.73 ms) and remote normal myocardium (blue, 32.03 ms).

Following the mean T2* calculations, two mean comparisons Leven’s tests (within the confidence interval [CI] of 0.95) were performed to analyze the mean differences significance between the results. The performed t-tests revealed a significant difference between the infarcted and normal/remote myocardial T2* values (P < 0.001), and a non-significant difference between the normal/remote and peri-infarction T2* measurements (P > 0.05). The ROC curve was drawn and AUC was 81% in the CI of 95%. The analysis cutoff value of 31.70 yielded 92% sensitivity and 72% specificity in the final results (Figure 3).

The receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curve for T2* values with 95% confidence interval (CI) to categorize the scar tissue from normal or peri-infarct tissue. The area under curve (AUC) was 81.6 (P value &lt; 0.001) for T2* to differentiate between scar and non-scar tissues.
Figure 3. The receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curve for T2* values with 95% confidence interval (CI) to categorize the scar tissue from normal or peri-infarct tissue. The area under curve (AUC) was 81.6 (P value < 0.001) for T2* to differentiate between scar and non-scar tissues.

5. Discussion

CMR imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, risk stratification and management of chronic MI patients. This modality of imaging brings useful information regarding left ventricular function, remodeling, edema, the infarcted myocardium substituting scar tissue size, and patients’ treatment strategies. In the chronic stage of MI, LGE imaging and its functional correlations are of special importance among all the others. Unfortunately, the administration of gadolinium is contraindicated in patients with acute or chronic severe renal impairments (with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 ml per min per 1.73 square meters) due to the risk of the nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (17, 23). Thus, an alternative imaging method to depict scar tissue formation without use of the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents could be of value. Several studies have evaluated the role of pre-contrast T1 and T2 mapping techniques in the diagnosis of MI. In 2014, Hamlin et al. reported an increase in the post-infarction scar tissue pre-contrast T1 values by comparison with the normal/remote regions (21). Another study conducted by Caudron et al. in 2013 revealed the same result (24). The two afore-mentioned studies are just two examples of tens of reports that have evaluated the role of T1 and T2 mapping techniques in the diagnosis of MI. However, few studies have attempted to evaluate the T2* quantitative value changes in this condition, although it was a more sensitive parameter to tissue alterations. The T2* relaxation time is composed of two elements, the T2 and T2*. On the other hand, the T2* relaxation time is affected by the spin-spin interaction effect and local magnetic field susceptibility changes. As a result, the T2* relaxation time is a more sensitive measure to evaluate the structural and pathological changes in tissues. In this study, we hypothesized that there would be significant rise in the post-infarction fibrotic tissue’s T2* relaxation times in comparison with the normal/remote myocardium. Although the sample population of this study was small, our alternative hypothesis was proved significantly (P < 0.001), and we noticed a significant increase in the chronically infarcted myocardium compared with the normal/remote myocardial tissue. We found that cutoff value of 31.70 is sensitive in differentiating scar tissue from non-scar tissue. We believe that the T2* relaxation time measurement would be a sensitive tool for tissue composition changes, but not an specific tool to tell us what exactly the composition would be, while the inflammatory or iron-deposition process could change these values. Also, the MVO and its underlying different magnetic susceptibility may decrease the study’s specificity to a great extent, while we did not differentiate between the scar tissue’s composition with or without the microvascular obstruction. On the other hand, if we could completely rule out confounding factors of any T2* changes clinically, we could correlate the T2* relaxation time changes with a specific tissue alteration in each myocardial disease. Undoubtedly, evaluation of the T2* relaxation times by T1 and T2 values could increase the non-contrast CMR’s sensitivity in MI evaluations. Every cardiac sequence might suffer from several common limitations and pitfalls that decrease the image quality, including patients’ lack of cooperation, cardiac arrhythmia, and claustrophobia. Like all other prospective researches, our study suffered from limited sample size and number of the analyzing ROIs, which could result in a lower reliability of the ultimate results. In addition, we did not measure the MVO T2* values at the pre-revascularization stage due the probable concurrence of scar tissue and MVO formation in the same coronary site. Furthermore, we highly recommend further research be conducted to investigate for any statistical correlations between the pre- and the post-revascularization stages.

In conclusion, CMR plays a vital role in the management of chronic MI. Although the viability assessments in cardiac MRI requires an injection of gadolinium-based contrast agents for delayed enhancement and scar tissue imaging, their administration is fully contraindicated in patients with severe renal failure. Through CMR technology developments in recent years, we have arrived to the point to address this issue. CMR relaxometry is a promising technique to evaluate myocardial tissue changes in non-contrast CMR by measuring T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times changes in any myocardial disease. In this study, in the event of any concomitant conditions or diseases being ruled out correctly by the reporting and performing clinicians, We proved that T2* relaxation time could be a sensitive measurement to diagnose myocardial scar tissue in patients with history of myocardial infarctions.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Cohn PF, Fox KM, Daly C. Silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2003;108(10):1263-77. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000088001.59265.EE. [PubMed: 12963683].

  • 2.

    Patel DJ, Knight CJ, Holdright DR, Mulcahy D, Clarke D, Wright C, et al. Pathophysiology of transient myocardial ischemia in acute coronary syndromes. Characterization by continuous ST-segment monitoring. Circulation. 1997;95(5):1185-92. [PubMed: 9054848].

  • 3.

    Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA, Grines CL, Krumholz HM, Johnson MN, et al. Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(9):916-47. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000351. [PubMed: 26811316].

  • 4.

    Panidis IP, Morganroth J. Two dimensional echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction: Clinical applications. In: Morganroth J, Moore EN, editors. Interventions in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. 41. US: Boston, MA: Springer; 1984. p. 88-102. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3819-2_8.

  • 5.

    Conti CR. The stunned and hibernating myocardium: a brief review. Clin Cardiol. 1991;14(9):708-12. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960140903. [PubMed: 1742904].

  • 6.

    Shan K, Constantine G, Sivananthan M, Flamm SD. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of myocardial viability. Circulation. 2004;109(11):1328-34. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000120294.67948.E3. [PubMed: 15037539].

  • 7.

    Sawyer DB, Loscalzo J. Myocardial hibernation: restorative or preterminal sleep? Circulation. 2002;105(13):1517-9. [PubMed: 11927510].

  • 8.

    Camici PG, Prasad SK, Rimoldi OE. Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability. Circulation. 2008;117(1):103-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.702993. [PubMed: 18172050].

  • 9.

    Wu KC, Lima JA. Noninvasive imaging of myocardial viability: current techniques and future developments. Circ Res. 2003;93(12):1146-58. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000103863.40055.E8. [PubMed: 14670830].

  • 10.

    Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116(11):1290-305. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688101. [PubMed: 17846343].

  • 11.

    Burrell S, MacDonald A. Artifacts and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006;34(4):193-211. quiz 212-4. [PubMed: 17146108].

  • 12.

    Mahrholdt H, Klem I, Sechtem U. Cardiovascular MRI for detection of myocardial viability and ischaemia. Heart. 2007;93(1):122-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.071290. [PubMed: 17170353]. [PubMed Central: PMC1861365].

  • 13.

    Sarikaya I. Cardiac applications of PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36(10):971-85. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000346. [PubMed: 26035516].

  • 14.

    Zaglavara T, Haaverstad R, Cumberledge B, Irvine T, Karvounis H, Parharidis G, et al. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with left ventricular dysfunction taking beta blockers: accuracy and optimal dose. Heart. 2002;87(4):329-35. doi: 10.1136/heart.87.4.329. [PubMed: 11907003]. [PubMed Central: PMC1767072].

  • 15.

    Marzullo P, Parodi O, Sambuceti G, Reisenhofer B, Gimelli A, Giorgetti A, et al. Myocardial viability: nuclear medicine versus stress echocardiography. Echocardiography. 1995;12(3):291-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1995.tb00552.x. [PubMed: 10150475].

  • 16.

    Perazzolo Marra M, Lima JA, Iliceto S. MRI in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(3):284-93. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq409. [PubMed: 21112897].

  • 17.

    Perazella MA. Gadolinium-contrast toxicity in patients with kidney disease: nephrotoxicity and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Curr Drug Saf. 2008;3(1):67-75. [PubMed: 18690983].

  • 18.

    Frangogiannis N. The inflammatory response in myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53(1):31-47. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00434-5.

  • 19.

    Ertl G, Frantz S. Healing after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;66(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.01.011. [PubMed: 15769445].

  • 20.

    Kim PK, Hong YJ, Im DJ, Suh YJ, Park CH, Kim JY, et al. Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping: Techniques and clinical applications. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(1):113-31. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.113. [PubMed: 28096723]. [PubMed Central: PMC5240500].

  • 21.

    Hamlin SA, Henry TS, Little BP, Lerakis S, Stillman AE. Mapping the future of cardiac MR imaging: case-based review of T1 and T2 mapping techniques. Radiographics. 2014;34(6):1594-611. doi: 10.1148/rg.346140030. [PubMed: 25310419].

  • 22.

    Kali A, Tang RL, Kumar A, Min JK, Dharmakumar R. Detection of acute reperfusion myocardial hemorrhage with cardiac MR imaging: T2 versus T2. Radiology. 2013;269(2):387-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122397. [PubMed: 23847253]. [PubMed Central: PMC3807083].

  • 23.

    Reiter T, Ritter O, Prince MR, Nordbeck P, Wanner C, Nagel E, et al. Minimizing risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:31. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-31. [PubMed: 22607376]. [PubMed Central: PMC3409035].

  • 24.

    Caudron J, Lefebvre V, Dubourg B, Fares J, Dacher JN. T1 and T2 mapping for the detection of myocardial edema in acute myocardial infarction by cardiac magnetic resonance. Radiological Society of North America 2013 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. 2013.

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: