Prevalence of Perinatal Central Nervous System Anomalies in East Azarbaijan-Iran

This Article

Citations


Article Information:


Group: 2011
Subgroup: Volume 8, Issue 2
Date: September 2011
Type: Original Article
Start Page: 79
End Page: 81

Authors:

  • Mostafa Ghavami
  • Department of Radiology, Shohada Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Ramin Abedinzadeh
  • Day Medical Imaging Center, Tabriz, Iran

      Correspondence:

      Affiliation: Department of Radiology, Shohada Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
      City, Province: Tabriz,
      Country: Iran
      Tel: +984113851027
      Fax: +984113328822
      E-mail: Mostafa.ghavami@yahoo.com

Abstract:


Background/Objective: Central nervous system (CNS) anomalies are the most serious congenital abnormalities. Ultrasound examination is an effective and noninvasive modality for prenatal diagnosis of these anomalies. The purpose of the current study was to determine the frequency of CNS and associated abnormalities.
Patients and Methods: A total of 22500 pregnant women who were referred by obstetricians/gynecologists for routine work up of pregnancy were scanned over a period of 3 years by two expert sonologists in a referral center using high resolution ultrasound unit.
Results: After transabdominal sonographic examination of 22500 pregnant women, 112 (0.5%) fetuses were detected with CNS anomalies, some of whom had more than one anomaly. Forty-one (37%) Chiari malformations, 26 (23%) monro and aqueductal stenosis cases, 18 (16%) anencephaly cases, nine (8%) encephaloceles, seven (6%) microcephalies, five (4%) Dandywalker syndromes, two (2%) arachnoid cysts, two (2%) agenesis of corpus callosum cases, one (1%) holoprosencephaly and one (1%) schizencephaly were reported in our study.
Conclusion: According to our results, Chiari malformation and hydrocephalus were the most prevalent anomalies of CNS congenital abnormalities in East Azarbaijan, Iran. An accurate diagnosis depends upon fetal age, amniotic fluid volume, fetal position, operator experience and careful evaluation for associated malformations, which are often present.

© 2011 Kowsar M.P.Co. All rights reserved.

 


Keywords: Ultrasound;Prenatal;Fetal Anomaly;Central Nervous System

Manuscript Body:


Introduction
Central nervous system congenital anomalies are the common abnormalities of all malformations (1). Sonographic examination is the choice modality and an effective method for diagnosis. It has been used for more than three decades as the main modality to help diagnose fetal CNS anomalies (2). Several studies have shown an accuracy of 92% to 99.7% for ultrasonographic detection of CNS anatomic anomalies (3,4). Routine anomaly scan during the antenatal period has become a part of obstetric care and the best time for fetal malformation scanning is approximately at 11-14, 18-20 and 28-30 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of major CNS anomalies in east Azarbaijan that could be detected by routine ultrasound examination.

Patients and Methods
In the current study, 22500 pregnant women were scanned in a referral center over a period of 3 years from March 2005 to March 2008 by two expert operators with the use of high resolution ultrasound unit with 3-5 MHz transabdominal transducers. (General electric logic a500, logic a200). They were all referred by obstetricians/gynecologists for routine work up of pregnancy. East Azarbaijan was divided into 5 regions; namely, Tabriz (as the central part), Maragheh, Ahar, Marand and Miyaneh.
Every ultrasound scan took about 15-30 minutes. Fetuses' brains and spines were scanned in axial, coronal and sagittal sections through most important anatomic areas; i.e., transventricular, transthalamic and transcerebellar and spinal canal planes. Abnormal contours of the head and spine and empty or enlarged brain cavities were considered as important diagnostic markers for the detection of CNS anomalies in early pregnancy in the current study.
All delivered abnormal fetuses were followed by calling their mothers and asking about the child’s health. Alive and still births were followed by the obstetrician’s and pediatrician’s report.
Data were presented as meanaSD frequency and percent and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using kappa coefficient. The chi-square test and independent samples t test were used to compare the different groups. SPSS 15 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) was used for statistical analysis.

Results
In sonographic examination of these 22500 pregnant women, 112 (0.5%) fetuses were detected with CNS anomalies, some of whom had more than one anomaly. The mean age of mothers without fetus anomaly was 22.18±9.44 years and in mothers with CNS anomalies in their fetuses the mean age was 34.21c7.53 years. The mothers had an age range of 25-42 years. The results of the t-test for independent groups showed a statistically significant difference (P=0.02). Gross CNS anomalies observed included Chiari malformations, 41 (37%); monro and aqueductal stenosis, 26 (23%); anencephaly, 18 (16%); encephalocele, 9 (8%); microcephaly, 7 (6%); Dandywalker syndrome, 5 (4%); arachnoid cyst, 2 (2%); agenesis of corpus callosum, 2 (2%); holoprosencephaly, 1 (1%); schizencephaly, 1 (1%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Frequency of CNS Anomalies

Type of Anomaly

Number of Fetuses Percentage

Chiari Malformation

41

36.6%

Monro and Aqueductal Stenosis

26 

33.2%

Anencephaly

18

16%

Encephalocele

8%

Microcephaly

7  

5.3%

Dandy Walker Syndrome

3.5%

Agenesis of Corpus Callosum

1.7%

Arachnoid Cyst

 1.7%

Holoprosencephaly

1

0.89%

Schizencephaly

0.89%

Total

112

100%

Among the assessed fetuses, 58 (52%) were male and 54 (48%) were female. The mean age in mothers with male fetuses was 33.52±6.91 years and 34.94±7.21 years for mothers with female fetuses and no significant difference was detected (P=0.32).
Associated anomalies detected included clubfoot, 14; polycystic kidney, 6; polyhydramnios, 5; Meckel Gruber syndrome, 3; cleft lip and palate, 2; cardiomegaly, 1; umbilical hernia, 1; microphtalmia, 1 (Table 2).
Geographical distribution of CNS anomalies has been demonstrated in Table 3.
Inter-observer agreement was confirmed by kappa coefficient (kappa=0.0791, P<0.001)

Table 2. Associated Anomalies

Type of Anomaly

Number of Fetuses  Percentage

Club Foot

14

42.4%

Polycystic Kidney

6  

18.1%

Polyhydramnios

15.1%

Meckel Gruber Syndrome

3

9%

Cleft Lip and Palate

2  

6%

Cardiomegaly

3%

Umbilical Hernia

3%

Microphthalmia

1

 3%

Total

33      

100%

Table 3. Distribution of CNS Anomalies in Different Regions of East Azarbaijan Province

Tabriz

68 (60.7%)

Maragheh

14 (12.5%)

Ahar

10 (8.9%)

Marand

12 (10.7%)

Miyaneh

8 (7.11%)

Discussion
The incidence of CNS anomalies varies in developed and non-developed countries due to folic acid supplementation (2). Additionally, it can follow a different pattern in one country based on regional food and nutritional habits. For instance, in our study, the overall incidence of major CNS anomalies was 5 per 1000 (0.5%). In one study from Khuzestan-Iran, the incidence of CNS anomalies was reported as 40 per 3012 (1.32%) pregnant women (3). In another population based study by Monteagudo, 55226 pregnancies were evaluated and 143 (0.26%) infants with CNS defects were found (4). While in a study published by Balakumar et al. on 857 pregnant cases, 336 (39.21%) abnormal fetuses with CNS malformations were reported (5).
The most serious complications of major CNS anomalies are disability and becoming bedridden. Thus, early diagnosis and therapeutic abortion of these major CNS anomalies is of great help to the health economy (1). Whereas, care of the affected person costs about 250,000 US dollars per person per lifetime in the United States of America (2).
With the widespread use of prenatal ultrasonography, fetal CNS anomalies are being detected increasingly (1). Since three dimensional and Doppler ultrasound scan have not clearly demonstrated their superiority over the routine two dimensional ultrasound imaging, prenatal ultrasonography has been based on two dimensional techniques. Color and power Doppler ultrasound scan may be used mainly to identify umbilical cord and cerebral vessels and 3D ultrasound can help to detect the lesions with complex anatomy (1). Sonographic examination is an accurate and non-invasive non-ionizing and relatively inexpensive diagnostic test for determining prenatal anomalies (4). The first trimester ultrasound examination can detect the majority of anencephalies (6).
Structures that are usually noted on a basic ultrasound examination of the fetal CNS include head shape, lateral ventricles, cavum septum pellucidum, thalami, cerebellum, cisterna magna and the spine. Open neural tube defects are the most common CNS malformations. Anencephaly, the single common open neural tube defect, is so severe that it is immediately detected when attempting to perform biometry of the fetal head.
Gestational age is a very important parameter for normal ultrasound appearance of the CNS system (2). For example, the corpus callosum can not be detected at 14 weeks of gestation because these structures appear after 18-20 weeks of gestation (5). On the other hand, the other technical factors that may cause inadequate ultrasound images are poor fetal position, obesity and oligohydramnios.
Neural tube defects are associated with an elevated maternal serum a-fetoprotein (MSAFP). In the past, all women with elevated MSAFP were offered amniocentesis as the diagnostic test (7), since elevated levels of amniotic fluid AFP together with elevated acetyl cholinesterase are considered to be diagnostic for fetal NTD (neural tube defect). Currently a detailed ultrasound scan is indicated in women with an elevated MSAFP. The sensitivity for the prenatal diagnosis of NTDs using ultrasound in experienced hands is excellent (8). As an example, the sensitivity for anencephaly has been reported to be 100 percent and the overall sensitivity for the detection of NTD is 97 percent with a 100 percent specificity (6).
Several studies have shown that routine ultrasound is more effective than MSAFP alone in identifying fetuses with NTD. For instance, in one study, the routine second trimester ultrasound detected 96% of the NTDs compared to 78% by MSAFP alone (6). According to our experience, the best time for fetal CNS malformations is about 11-14, 18-20 and 28-30 weeks of gestation.

References: (8)

  1. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the 'basic examination' and the 'fetal neurosonogram'. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29(1):109-16. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.3909 ]
  2. Kazmi SS, Nejat F, Tajik P, Roozbeh H. The prenatal ultrasonographic detection of myelomeningocele in patients referred to Children's Hospital Medical Center: a cross sectional study. Reprod Health 2006 July;3:6. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-3-6 ]
  3. Tahmasebi M, Afsar N, Bastani M. Accuracy of ultrasound in detection of gross prenatal central nervous system anomalies after the eighteenth week of gestation. Iran J Radiol 2007;4(4).
  4. Blass HG, Eik-Nes SH. Sonoembryology and early prenatal diagnosis of neural anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2009 Apr;29(4):312-25. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.2170 ]
  5. Balakumar K, Antenatal ultrasound screening for anomalies among singletons- results of a prospective study. Calicut Med J 2004;2(1):e9.
  6. Carroll SG, Porter H, Abdel-Fattah S, Kyle PM,. Soothill PW. Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000 Aug;16(2):149-53. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00199.x ]
  7. Fong KW, Toi A, Salem S, Hornberger LK, Chitayat D, Keating SJ et al. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities with US during early pregnancy. Radiographics. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):157-74. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.241035027 ]
  8. Bahado-Singh RO, Khalek N, Short A. Ultrasound technology for the accurate detection of fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;1:34-8.